JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SOCREL Archives


SOCREL Archives

SOCREL Archives


SOCREL@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SOCREL Home

SOCREL Home

SOCREL  July 2010

SOCREL July 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Rome Fiddles, We Burn

From:

Luis Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Luis Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:22:06 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (112 lines)

Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Washington, the chairman of the Committee on 
Doctrine of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, asserted, 
"The Catholic Church, through its long and constant teaching, holds that 
ordination has been, from the beginning, reserved to men, a fact which 
cannot be changed despite changing times."

Of course it can be done; this is no bigger than the decision narrated 
in Acts 15.  Only God can judge, but could it be that they just don't 
want to do it?  In due time, we shall know for sure ...

Luis
--------------------------------------------------------
Rome Fiddles, We Burn
Maureen Dowd, New York Times, 18 July 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/opinion/18dowd.html

If the Vatican is trying to restore the impression that its moral sense 
is intact, issuing a document that equates pedophilia with the 
ordination of women doesn’t really do that.

The Catholic Church continued to heap insult upon injury when it 
revealed its long-awaited new rules on clergy sex abuse, rules that the 
Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said signaled a 
commitment to grasp the nettle with "rigor and transparency."

The church still believes in its own intrinsic holiness despite all 
evidence to the contrary. It thinks it’s making huge concessions on the 
unstoppable abuse scandal when it’s taking baby steps.

The casuistic document did not issue a zero-tolerance policy to defrock 
priests after they are found guilty of pedophilia; it did not order 
bishops to report every instance of abuse to the police; it did not set 
up sanctions on bishops who sweep abuse under the rectory rug; it did 
not eliminate the statute of limitations for abused children; it did not 
tell bishops to stop lobbying legislatures to prevent child-abuse laws 
from being toughened.

There is no moral awakening here. The cruelty and indecency of child 
abuse once more inspires tactical contrition. All the penitence of the 
church is grudging and reactive. Church leaders are merely as penitent 
as they need to be to protect the institution.

Can you imagine such a scene in the confessional?

"Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned. I am as sorry as my job or 
school requires me to be."

"But my daughter, that is not true penitence. That’s situational penitence."

After the Belgian police bracingly conducted raids on the church 
hierarchy, inspired in part by the horrifying case of a boy molested for 
years by his uncle, the bishop of Bruges, a case that the church ignored 
and covered up for 25 years, the pope did not applaud the more 
aggressive tack. He condemned it.

In a remarkable Times story recently, Laurie Goodstein and David 
Halbfinger debunked the spin that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger had been one 
of the more alert officials on the issue of sexual abuse:

"The future pope, it is now clear, was also part of a culture of 
nonresponsibility, denial, legalistic foot-dragging and outright 
obstruction. More than any top Vatican official other than John Paul, it 
was Cardinal Ratzinger who might have taken decisive action in the 1990s 
to prevent the scandal from metastasizing in country after country, 
growing to such proportions that it now threatens to consume his own 
papacy."

If Roman Polanski were a priest, he’d still be working here.

Stupefyingly, the new Vatican document also links raping children with 
ordaining women as priests, deeming both "graviora delicta," or grave 
offenses. Clerics who attempt to ordain women can now be defrocked.

On Beliefnet, Mark Silk, a professor of religion at Connecticut’s 
Trinity College, suggested that the stronger threat against women’s 
ordination is not "a maladroit add-on" but the medieval Vatican’s "main 
business."

After the Vatican launched two inquisitions of American nuns, it didn’t 
seem possible that the archconservative Il Papa and his paternalistic 
redoubt could get more unenlightened, but they have somehow managed it.

Letting women be priests — which should be seen as a way to help cleanse 
the church and move it beyond its infantilized and defensive state — is 
now on the list of awful sins right next to pedophilia, heresy, apostasy 
and schism.

Archbishop Donald Wuerl of Washington, the chairman of the Committee on 
Doctrine of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, asserted, 
"The Catholic Church, through its long and constant teaching, holds that 
ordination has been, from the beginning, reserved to men, a fact which 
cannot be changed despite changing times."

But if it was reserved to celibate men centuries ago simply as a way for 
the church to keep land, why can’t it be changed? If a society makes 
strides in not subordinating women, why can’t the church reflect that? 
If men prove that all-male hierarchies can get shamefully warped, why 
can’t they embrace the normality of equality? The Vatican’s insistence 
on male prerogative is misogynistic poppycock — enhancing American 
Catholics’ disenchantment with Rome.

In The New Republic, Garry Wills wrote about his struggle to come to 
terms with the sins of his church: Jesus "is the one who said, ‘Whatever 
you did to any of my brothers, even the lowliest, you did to me.’ That 
means that the priests abusing the vulnerable young were doing that to 
Jesus, raping Jesus. Any clerical functionary who shows more sympathy 
for the predator priests than for their victims instantly disqualified 
himself as a follower of Jesus. The cardinals said they must care for 
their own, going to jail if necessary to protect a priest. We say the 
same thing, but the ‘our own’ we care for are the victimized, the poor, 
the violated. They are Jesus."

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager