JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SOCREL Archives


SOCREL Archives

SOCREL Archives


SOCREL@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SOCREL Home

SOCREL Home

SOCREL  July 2010

SOCREL July 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Transparency

From:

Luis Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Luis Gutierrez <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:48:16 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (138 lines)

Thank God, *everything* is now crystal clear ... isn't it?

Luis
---------------------------------------------------------
PUBLICATION OF CDF NORMS ON MOST SERIOUS CRIMES

VATICAN CITY, 15 JUL 2010 (VIS) - The Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith today published its new "Norms concerning the most serious crimes".
Given below is the text of an explanatory note on the new measures, issued
by Holy See Press Office Director Fr. Federico Lombardi S.J.

   In 2001 the Holy Father John Paul II promulgated a very important
document, the Motu Proprio "Sacramentorum sanctitatis tutela", which gave
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith responsibility to deal with
and judge a series of particularly serious crimes within the ambit of canon
law. This responsibility had previously been attributed also to other
dicasteries, or was not completely clear.

   The Motu Proprio (the "law" in the strict sense) was accompanied by a
series of practical and procedural Norms, known as "Normae de gravioribus
delictis". Over the nine years since then, experience has naturally
suggested that these Norms be integrated and updated, so as to streamline
and simplify the procedures and make them more effective, and to take
account of new problems. This has been achieved principally by the Pope
attributing new "faculties" to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith; faculties which, however, were not organically integrated into the
initial Norms. This has now come about, within the context of a systematic
revision of those Norms.

   The serious crimes to which the regulations referred concerned vital
aspects of Church life: the Sacraments of the Eucharist and of Penance, but
also sexual abuse committed by a priest against a minor under the age of
eighteen.

   The vast public echo this latter kind of crime has had over recent years
has attracted great attention and generated intense debate on the norms and
procedures applied by the Church to judge and punish such acts.

   It is right, then, that there should be complete clarity concerning the
regulations currently in force in this field, and that these regulations be
presented organically so as to facilitate the work of the people who deal
with these matters.

   An initial clarification - especially for use by the media - was provided
recently with the publication on the Holy See website of a brief "Guide to
Understanding Basic CDF Procedures concerning Sexual Abuse Allegations". The
publication of the new Norms is, however, quite a different thing, providing
us with an official and updated legal text which is valid for the whole
Church.

   In order to facilitate the reading of the Norms by a non-specialist
public, particularly interested in the problems of sexual abuse, we will
seek to highlight a number of important aspects:

   Among the novelties introduced with respect to the earlier Norms, mention
must be made, above all, of measures intended to accelerate procedures, such
as the possibility of not following the "judicial process" but proceeding by
"extrajudicial decree", or that of presenting (in particular circumstances)
the most serious cases to the Holy Father with a view to dismissing the
offender from the clerical state.

   Another Norm intended to simplify earlier problems and to take account of
the evolution of the situation in the Church concerns the possibility of
having not only priests but also lay persons as members of the tribunal
staff, or as lawyers or prosecutors. Likewise, in order to undertake these
functions it is no longer strictly necessary to have a doctorate in canon
law, but the required competency can also be proved in another way; for
example, with a licentiate.

   Another aspect worthy of note is the increase of the statue of
limitations
from ten years to twenty years, with the possibility of extension even
beyond that period.

   Another significant aspect is establishing parity between the abuse of
mentally disabled people and that of minors, and the introduction of a new
category: paedophile pornography. This is defined as: "the acquisition,
possession or disclosure" by a member of the clergy, "in any way and by any
means, of pornographic images of minors under the age of fourteen".

   Regulations concerning the secrecy of trials are maintained, in order to
safeguard the dignity of all the people involved.

   One point that remains untouched, though it has often been the subject of
discussion in recent times, concerns collaboration with the civil
authorities. It must be borne in mind that the Norms being published today
are part of the penal code of canon law, which is complete in itself and
entirely distinct from the law of States.

   On this subject, however, it is important to take note of the "Guide to
Understanding Basic CDF Procedures concerning Sexual Abuse Allegations", as
published on the Holy See website. In that Guide, the phrase "Civil law
concerning reporting of crimes to the appropriate authorities should always
be followed" is contained in the section dedicated to "Preliminary
Procedures". This means that in the practice suggested by the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith it is necessary to comply with the
requirements of law in the various countries, and to do so in good time, not
during or subsequent to the canonical trial.

   Today's publication of the Norms makes a great contribution to the
clarity
and certainty of law in this field; a field in which the Church is today
strongly committed to proceeding with rigour and transparency so as to
respond fully to the just expectations of moral coherence and evangelical
sanctity nourished by the faithful and by public opinion, and which the Holy
Father has constantly reiterated.

   Of course, many other measures and initiatives are required from the
various ecclesiastical bodies. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith is currently examining how to help the bishops of the world formulate
and develop, coherently and effectively, the indications and guidelines
necessary to face the problems of the sexual abuse of minors, either by
members of the clergy or within the environment of activities and
institutions connected with the Church, bearing in mind the situation and
the problems of the societies in which they operate.

   This will be another crucial step on the Church's journey as she
translates into permanent practice and continuous awareness the fruits of
the teachings and ideas that have matured over the course of the painful
events of the "crisis" engendered by sexual abuse by members of the clergy.

   In order to complete this brief overview of the principal novelties
contained in the "Norms", mention must also be made of those that refer to
crimes of a different nature. In this case too it is not so much a case of
introducing new substance as of integrating rules that are already in force
so as to obtain a better ordered and more organic set of regulations on the
"most serious crimes" reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith.

   These include crimes against the faith (heresy, apostasy and schism) for
which competency normally falls to ordinaries, although the Congregation
becomes competent in the case of an appeal; the malicious recording and
disclosure of sacramental Confession about which a decree of condemnation
was published in 1988; and the attempted ordination of women, about which a
decree was published in 2007.
OP/                                    VIS
20100715 (1190)

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager