The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  July 2010

DISABILITY-RESEARCH July 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Day 4 in New York at UN CEDAW

From:

Frank Hall-Bentick <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Frank Hall-Bentick <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 17 Jul 2010 07:37:45 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (100 lines)

FYI.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Christina Ryan 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 11:43 PM
Subject: [wwda-discuss] Day 4 in New York at CEDAW


Dear WWDA women
 
Day 4 - Thursday 16 July

 

A very long day and not as productive as we would have liked. 

 

The big plus was that I had my first full night of sleep for about 5 days so I was fresh and ready to roll. We had arranged to gather at 9.30 in the lobby of the conference centre where the Committee is in session. My new security arrangements worked okay, although frankly the UN really doesn't seem to be aware of how to manage with wheelchairs in the building. Clearly people using chairs only come as visitors not to work; otherwise the security would be less ridiculous. To get to the conference centre I have to go back out into the street after doing the security check. Now anything could happen in the street, although it won't with me, but how do they know that?

 

Meeting at 9.30 was the first time all 7 of us had actually met as a delegation. Half of us had never seen each other before even though we have been talking on the phone for months, and in some cases we have been working together via phone and email for 6 or 7 years. So, it's terrific to finally all see what we look like and get down to work. 

 

Our aim for the day was to finalise the lobbying sheets and get our statement underway. Well made plans can go awry! We started with observing Russia giving its country report and made the mistake of sitting in front on the Russian NGO women, so we felt rude leaving after only half an hour as planned and ended up staying for almost 2 hours. This really threw a spanner in the works of our day and meant that we wasted a lot of productive time. Stupid really, but we still found the Russian report fascinating. Clearly they have a long way to go on women's rights, and the Committee weren't very impressed by some of the "traditional" ways that women were viewed. 

 

Finally we got upstairs to the cafeteria for a cup of tea and some work at 12.30. We started by identifying the top 12 issues for our delegation. As our delegation has been selected by an open and rigorous selection process we are able to act fairly independently as representatives of our various groups. So, as long as we stick to our Shadow Report and work within the accepted framework we can make decisions on the spot about what include and emphasise. 

 

I'm very lucky to have a well prepared WWDA behind me so knowing what issues to push isn't hard for me and my real role here is to ensure that the voice of women with disabilities stays in the mix. I do know that if we hadn't had someone here then some of our critical issues would have slipped off the list, so it is important to be here and make sure that we are heard. 

 

The big issues for WWDA are violence (which includes sterilisation, access to violence support services), parenting and the right to parent, data collection disaggregated by gender and disability, the disparity in service provision between women and me with disabilities, and health/reproductive rights (coerced abortion, menstrual suppression, access to health services). This isn't how the list looked when we left, but the key issues are still represented in the broader mix that we must come up with to ensure we don't drop off completely. 

 

Our Shadow Report has been written against the various articles of CEDAW. This is the way the Committee looked at it last time and we had prepared something different, so we feel prepared and have arranged our lobbying sheets to support this. 

 

Yesterday we discover that this isn't the process now. Although the Committee works through each article during a country report they tend to look at the cross cutting issues. So, if we had used the model we used last time we would have been more on target. Our first delegation discussion around priority issues is about reframing our existing work against the issues, rather than the articles. 

 

We end up with 14 priority issues, including women with disabilities, CALD, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women as headings amongst others like violence, representation and participation, reproductive health, etc. The reason for having 3 headings to cover our minority population groups is to ensure the Committee gets the best potential for considering the critical issues against each of these in addition to them appearing under the other subject headings. 

 

I spend the rest of the day drafting a paragraph about women with disabilities. This isn't as easy as it sounds. We are drafting paragraphs against each priority issue in a format that the Committee could use as its Concluding Comments. Of course it will be up to them whether they are used or not, but at least we are giving them as much preparation and support as we can. We focus on general inclusion and participation for the 3 minority group paragraphs. 

 

Late in the day several of our group go across to the UN building to catch the end day debrief and see what has happened behind the scenes that we need to know about. We discover that both Friday and Monday will be closed sessions, so our capacity to lobby individual Committee members will be zero. This is a real blow to our game plan and we have to do a major rethink. 

 

We also discover that we must submit our lobbying and priority sheets to the Secretariat on Friday, with an index page; we are not allowed to give Committee members anything directly. This is also a real blow as we are not prepared enough and will now need to work overtime Thursday night to be ready. 

 

Our only real time with the Committee is during the lunch session on Monday, which we now discover will be about an hour. This is more than we were originally told, but it puts the pressure on to ensure we use this time very wisely. We must also prepare for Monday lunch robustly and not lose this valuable opportunity. 

 

So, at abut 6.30 pm Thursday we realise that we have a long night ahead of us, and are also very aware that 3 of us, including me, are spending the next 3 days in training. We realise that doing the training the previous weekend would have made more sense, and also realise that we need the next 3 days to be mega prepared. Suddenly everything is tense and the group is already exhausted after a long day.

 

With nothing left to give I head home and am in bed an hour later. The other women all keep going and arrange to meet me before training in the morning to go over what has been achieved during the night. 

 

Yesterday we practiced being flexible, today we had to really use that skill and it still wasn't as strong as it needed to be. It's like the rules change all the time so that no one can lobby effectively. I'm sure that isn't deliberate as the UN really does value the NGO contributions. It's more likely that systems have simply been adjusted over time to improve them and support the Committee better. Makes it really difficult when we only engage once every 4 years, rather than the constant awareness that others would have. 

 

So, an early start Friday to catch up before training and another very hot day forecast. 



cheers

Christina

________________End of message________________

This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]

Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager