...always inspiring: Portland Oregon`s history/approach. If they can do it
in the US, you can do it down under and anywhere...
http://www.portlandonline.com/transportation/index.cfm?c=44597
-----Original Message-----
From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Simon P J
Batterbury
Sent: Montag, 26. Juli 2010 17:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CYCLING-AND-SOCIETY] Melbourne developments
Great (huge) article thanks!. But, coming from a public health perspective,
they don't really address how collective action can result in better
infrastructure >>>more cycling! There are some shining examples of the
former in London. The momentum appears to have been mantained, too. The
group I referred to had 5 members in 1994 - 1000 on the listserv now.
________________________________
From: Cycling and Society Research Group discussion list on behalf of Nick
Cavill
Sent: Tue 27/07/2010 12:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Melbourne developments
Thanks Simon - very interesting.
There was one other major factor behind the increase in cycling in London
along with congestion charge and the massive increase in good quality cycle
infrastructure: the 7/7 bombings. There are few proper data on this but
evidence of a spike in cycling afterwards, and loads of stories of bike
shops being swamped as people avoided public transport. Not something to
replicate elsewhere...
Good evidence is contained in this article:
http://policy.rutgers.edu/faculty/pucher/Pucher_Dill_Handy10.pdf
Nick Cavill
Public Health Advisor
Cycling England
|