How odd to think that the many of the people questioned amongst those at the john innes centre were (due to nothing more than their age) amongst those who were told incorrectly that plastic was the answer to all our problems, that coal power stations were ideal and that smoking didn't harm us.
It's surprising how quickly science can disprove the scientists they 'trust'
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-----Original Message-----
From: "dee rawsthorne (TOC)" <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:59:11
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [PSCI-COM] Complacency about public trust in climate change
science?
During a small (about 100 people) public engagement event organised by the John Innes Centre in Norwich in May 2009 we asked the audience which source of information about climate change did they trust the most. 55% said scientists, 41% said they didn't know who to trust, 3% the internet and nobody trusted information received from friends, government or the media.
The audience were predominantly (70%) over 60 and well educated, if anyone wants a copy of the full results let me know off list.
Dee
-----Original Message-----
From: psci-com: on public engagement with science [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bob Ward
Sent: 14 June 2010 18:33
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PSCI-COM] Complacency about public trust in climate change science?
I would be interested in hearing thoughts from psci-commers on a couple
of new surveys of public opinion about climate change science.
A very interesting report was published last Friday by Cardiff
University on 'Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures
in Britain': http://www.understanding-risk.org/
Among its key findings is that while an overwhelming majority (78%) of
the public think that the climate is changing, this is markedly less
than the 91% who agreed with this statement in 2005. Only 24% agree that
climate change is mainly caused by human activity, and 20% disagree or
strongly disagree with the statement that "most scientists agree that
humans are causing climate change".
While this is informative research, I have one criticism - although it
notes that 40% believe the seriousness of climate change is exaggerated,
it does not explore to what extent scientists are trusted as a source of
information, even though there has been a lot of negative media coverage
over the past six months about the controversies involving the
University of East Anglia and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change.
This is in contrast with a new poll published last week by Stanford
University which includes an examination of whether trust has been
affected by these controversies:
http://woods.stanford.edu/docs/surveys/Global-Warming-Survey-Selected-Re
sults-June2010.pdf
Among its findings are that 32% of the US public remember hearing about
the controversy over the UEA e-mails, and a small but detectable
minority (9%) now believe as a result that scientists who study the
world's climate should not be trusted. Similarly, 24% of the US public
remember hearing about the controversy over mistakes in the last report
by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and 13% now believe as
a result that the report should not be trusted.
I have not seen a single poll of the UK public that has asked about
trust in climate scientists, even though the UEA controversy is much
closer to home and the volume of media coverage has been much greater
here. Surely this is worth investigation by researchers? Or maybe there
is a perception in the UK that public opinion hasn't been affected? Or
we think it doesn't matter? Are we being complacent?
Bob Ward
Policy and Communications Director
Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
London School of Economics and Political Science
Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE
http://www.lse.ac.uk/grantham
Tel. +44 (0) 20 7106 1236
Mob. +44 (0) 7811 320346
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/planningAndCorporatePolicy/legalandComplianceTeam/legal/disclaimer.htm
**********************************************************************
1. To suspend yourself from the list, whilst on leave, for example,
send an email to mailto:[log in to unmask] with the following message:
set psci-com nomail -- [include hyphens]
2. To resume email from the list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message:
set psci-com mail -- [include hyphens]
3. To leave psci-com, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message:
leave psci-com -- [include hyphens]
4. Further information about the psci-com discussion list, including list archive, can be found at the list web site: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/psci-com.html
5. The psci-com gateway to internet resources on science communication and science and society can be found at http://psci-com.ac.uk
6. To contact the Psci-com list owner, please send an email to mailto:[log in to unmask]
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
1. To suspend yourself from the list, whilst on leave, for example,
send an email to mailto:[log in to unmask] with the following message:
set psci-com nomail -- [include hyphens]
2. To resume email from the list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message:
set psci-com mail -- [include hyphens]
3. To leave psci-com, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message:
leave psci-com -- [include hyphens]
4. Further information about the psci-com discussion list, including list archive, can be found at the list web site: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/psci-com.html
5. The psci-com gateway to internet resources on science communication and science and society can be found at http://psci-com.ac.uk
6. To contact the Psci-com list owner, please send an email to mailto:[log in to unmask]
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
1. To suspend yourself from the list, whilst on leave, for example,
send an email to mailto:[log in to unmask] with the following message:
set psci-com nomail -- [include hyphens]
2. To resume email from the list, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message:
set psci-com mail -- [include hyphens]
3. To leave psci-com, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message:
leave psci-com -- [include hyphens]
4. Further information about the psci-com discussion list, including list archive, can be found at the list web site: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/psci-com.html
5. The psci-com gateway to internet resources on science communication and science and society can be found at http://psci-com.ac.uk
6. To contact the Psci-com list owner, please send an email to mailto:[log in to unmask]
**********************************************************************
|