Am 02.06.2010 um 11:43 schrieb giorgio curti:
> Yes, Thomas, because "anti-zionist and anti-semitic motivations behind this" does not suggest that at all, right? Nice tactic though, accusing and faulting others (i.e. "not able to think in non-substancialised terms on the topic") for doing the very things you are doing.
>
Sorry, I don't won't to bother the list: No, it is simply relational. If you relate to something in a reductive and onesided way to produce images and influence opinion on Israel in a negative way you are acting anti-zionist (or anti-American in a similar case; or, to put a quote from the list here, "they" should give back the "stolen" land). If the motivation for this "sublimation" can be encountered since decades in always the pics to show the "bestiality" of their deeds (mother with child - and nobody knows what they have to do with the report, always the same Palestinian ambulance aidman carrying "victims" from left to right, there are thousands of such documents) it is anti-semitic since they "hate Jews more than necessary" - if you are capable of cynicism.
Or, to put it the other way round: what the hell brought these people to ship aid to Gaza and not to one of the 10.000 other sites of humanitarian desaster? Ask them, you will be surprised.
"Why the Jews, not the Cyclists?" - "Why the Cyclists???" - "Why the Jews?"
th.
|