JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BCS-HCI Archives


BCS-HCI Archives

BCS-HCI Archives


BCS-HCI@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BCS-HCI Home

BCS-HCI Home

BCS-HCI  June 2010

BCS-HCI June 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

cfp: NordiCHI 2010 workshop on Interplay between User Experience Evaluation and Software Development (I-UxSED 2010)

From:

British HCI News <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

British HCI News <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:32:16 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (113 lines)

 
~~~~~~~ BRITISH HCI GROUP NEWS SERVICE ~~~~~~~~~~~ 
~~ http://www.bcs-hci.org.uk/ ~~ 
~~ All news to: [log in to unmask] ~~ 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ NOTE: Please reply to article's originator, ~~ 
~~ not the News Service ~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

========================================================================
Call For Papers

Workshop on
Interplay between User Experience Evaluation and Software Development (I-UxSED 2010)

17th October 2010
at NordiCHI 2010, Reykjavik, Iceland
Deadline for submissions: 25th July 2010

Website:http://users.dsic.upv.es/workshops/i-uxsed10/

========================================================================
BACKGROUND AND CHALLENGES

I-UxSED 2010 is built upon the tradition of I-USED'08 and '09 (International Workshop on the Interplay between Usability Evaluation and Software Development). It, however, targets at a much broader scope of User Experience (UX) where user's emotions, affects, motivations, and values are given as much, if not more, attention than ease of use, ease of learning and basic subjective satisfaction - the three traditional usability metrics.

We understand the relationship between UX and usability as the latter is subsumed by the former. Usability evaluation methods (UEMs) and metrics are relatively more mature. In contrast, UX evaluation methods (UXEMs) which draw largely on UEMs are still taking shape. It is conceivable that feeding outcomes of UX evaluation back to the software development cycle and instigating the required changes can even be more challenging than doing so for Usability Evaluation (UE). Several challenges are as
follows:
* UX attributes are (much) more fuzzy and malleable, what kinds of diagnostic information and improvement suggestion can be drawn from evaluation feedback. How does the evaluation feedback enable designers/developers to fix this experiential problem (cf. usability
problem) and how can they know that their fix works?
* Emphasis is put on conducting UE in the early phases of a development lifecycle with the use of low fidelity prototypes. However, is this principle applicable to UX evaluation? Is it feasible to capture authentic experiential responses with a low-fidelity prototype? If yes, how can we draw insights from these responses?
* Irrespective of whether formal or informal evaluation approaches are applied to usability or UX, it is the persuasiveness of empirical evidence that is ultimately the test of its worth. Is UX evaluation feedback less persuasive than usability feedback? If yes, will the impact of UX evaluation be weaker than UE?
* Software Engineering (SE) community has recognized that usability does not only affect the design of user interfaces but the software system development as a whole. Can such recognition and implications be taken for granted for UX, given that the evaluation methodologies and measures of UX could be very different (e.g. artistic performance)?
While the gap between HCI and SE with regard to usability has somewhat been narrowed, thanks to years of endeavour of the researchers in both communities, it may be widened again due to the emergence of UX.

GOALS

The goal of this Workshop is to bring together researchers and practitioners from HCI and SE to identify challenges and plausible resolutions to optimize the impact of UX evaluation feedback on the development of systems that should eventually be usable, pleasurable and desirable. With this focus, contributions on the following topics, but are not limited to, are invited:
* Which artefacts of software development are useful as the basis for UX evaluation and how do such artefacts influence the selection of UX evaluation methods?
* What are the forms and characteristics of UX evaluation feedback that are considered or proved useful and necessary for software development (including the UI design)?
* How can UX evaluation methods be integrated in emerging techniques and approaches for software development (including the UI design)?
* How do software designers'/developers' perceptions of UX evaluation feedback relate to their redesign strategies and approaches (e.g. 
prioritisation)?
* How can the effectiveness of UX evaluation feedback in improving the software quality be evaluated (i.e. the issue of downstream utility)?
Participants
Participants (max. 20) are accepted on the basis of their submitted papers. The intended audience is primarily SE and HCI researchers and practitioners who are working on and have experiences with the theme.

IMPORTANT DATES

Submission Deadline: 25th July 2010
Acceptance Notification: 15th August 2010 Camera-ready Deadline: 1st September 2010
Workshop: 17th October 2010 (one full-day)

SUBMISSION PROCEDURE

Papers should be submitted in PDF-format to the workshop reviewing system at (http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=iuxsed2010). 
Submissions should preferably describe empirical studies of the interplay between UX evaluation and software development, but those addressing theoretical frameworks for this theme are welcome as well.

Two types of submissions are solicited: Full papers with up to 6 pages describing substantial, completed work, and position papers with 2 pages describing either results that can be concisely reported or work in progress. Both types of papers should be formatted according to the SIGCHI ACM template. All papers will be peer reviewed. The workshop proceedings will be published on-line in CEUR-WS.org (ISSN 1613-0073) Activities Planned and Outcomes The tentative workshop programme is as follows:
* A keynote speech by a recognized researcher in the field
* Presentation of selected papers
* Small thematic group discussion on major issues
* Plenary report and discussion of main issues
* Future work and collaboration
We plan to contact key HCI journals about their willingness to produce a special issue on the topic of the workshop.

PROGRAM COMMITTEE

* Arnold P.O.S Vermeeren, TU Delft, the Netherlands
* Asbjørn Følstad, SINTEF, Norway
* Marianna Obrist, University of Salzburg, Austria
* Virpi Roto, Nokia Research Centre, Finland
* Scott Ambler, IBM Rational (to be confirmed)
* Tiziana Catarci, Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza', Italy (to be confirmed)
* Natalia Juristo, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain (to be
confirmed)
* Jair Leite, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Brazil (to be
confirmed)
* Nuno Jardim Nunes, University of Madeira, Portugal (to be confirmed)

WORKSHOP ORGANISERS

* Effie L-C Law, University of Leicester, UK
* Silvia Abrahão, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain
* Jan Stage, Aalborg University, Denmark

For enquiry, please send email to Effie Law:
[log in to unmask] OR [log in to unmask]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ To receive HCI news, send the message: ~~ 
~~ "JOIN BCS-HCI your_firstname your_lastname" ~~ 
~~ to [log in to unmask] ~~ 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ Newsarchives: ~~
~~ http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/bcs-hci.html ~~ 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ To join the British HCI Group, contact ~~ 
~~ [log in to unmask] ~~ 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Edinburgh Napier University - one of the top 10 universities in the UK for graduate employability (HESA 2009) and proud winners of the Queen's Anniversary Prizes for Higher and Further Education 2009, awarded for innovative housing construction for environmental benefit and quality of life.

This message is intended for the addressee(s) only
and should not be read, copied or disclosed to anyone else outwith the University without the permission of the sender. It is your responsibility to ensure that this message and any attachments are scanned for viruses or other defects. 
Edinburgh Napier University does not accept liability for any loss or
damage which may result from this email or any attachment, or for errors or omissions arising after it was sent. Email is not a secure medium. Email entering the University's system is subject to routine monitoring and filtering by the University. 

Edinburgh Napier University is a registered Scottish
charity.
Registration number SC018373

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager