Hi,
I really would not worry about this.
The atlases are not that accurate as the population variation is quite
large and
so moving 1mm typically makes very little difference. You certainly
shouldn't
expect that what you are finding is really that accurate as the
various errors
and data quality in analysis pipelines is unlikely to give you
anything where
you could definitely trust one coordinate value vs one that is 1mm
away, and
even if you did, the differences in the probabilistic atlases would be
minimal.
All the best,
Mark
On 17 May 2010, at 16:48, Estephan Moana wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification Mark. The problem is that if I open the
> 1mm and 2mm templates in fslview and use coordinates that are odd,
> e.g. -11, -34, 65, the output of the atlas tools are different
> between the two (as expected). Using atlasquery in the command line
> using those coordinates, it gives the same output as the 1mm
> template in fslview for "Juelich Histological Atlas", but for the
> "MNI Structural Atlas" it actually gives the location as in the 2mm
> template (equivalent to the even coordinate -10,-34,64). Is there a
> way to make it consistently use the 1mm template for atlases?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Estephan
>
|