JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives


SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives

SIDNEY-SPENSER Archives


SIDNEY-SPENSER@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SIDNEY-SPENSER Home

SIDNEY-SPENSER Home

SIDNEY-SPENSER  April 2010

SIDNEY-SPENSER April 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: An Online Spenser Encyclopedia

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

Sidney-Spenser Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:35:44 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (121 lines)

I agree with this. It isn't just authorial ego and understandable
tenure-anxiety, after all, but ours is a relatively small world and we
often know where each of us is, as they say, coming from and even how to
contact them to learn more. Anne.

 My one concern about the wikipedia model is the anonymity of authors.
> Surely
> one of the great strengths of the Spenser Encyclopedia is the quality of
> its
> contributors? I know there has been much debated about the merits and
> demerits of Wikipedia, with a strong argument made for its being no more
> or
> less accurate than more conventional encyclopedias. But I'm not sure this
> would apply to a more specialized reference work like a new SpEnc. Give
> the
> amount of work involved in researching and writing major articles for such
> a
> work, I suspect authors would want to get credit for their work,
> especially
> in terms of promotion and tenure. But perhaps no one was suggesting a new
> SpEnc follow this aspect of Wikipedia. In other respects this seems an
> excellent idea. I'd note too that many of the articles in the SpEnc have
> applications far beyond Spenser, and an online format would allow or
> facilitate access to a wider range of scholars than Spenserians.
>
> Hannibal
>
>
>
> 2010/4/21 Herron, Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
>
>> Hi — I assume Toronto UP would have first dibs on this sort of thing,
>> and
>> if not, I’d encourage Oxford UP or Julian Lethbridge and Manchester UP
>> to
>> get involved somehow.  It’d be a money-maker too, I’m sure, in terms of
>> electronic subscriptions.  (BTW, the SpEnc is a steal when on sale for
>> $35
>> at the U Toronto table at Kalamazoo, as it usually is).  Think too of
>> the
>> links that could be made to iconography etc.  So perhaps Gale or
>> Blackwell
>> or some other journal/database provider will swoop in on it.  It is so
>> helpful on so many topics germane to our field, that if put on-line, I
>> imagine it could/would morph into a renaissance lit resource more
>> generally.
>> --TH
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/20/10 6:20 PM, "Bruce Danner"
>> <[log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>   The concept of an online Spenser Encyclopedia, updatable and editable
>> in
>> wiki form, available with links to bibliography entries [to the Spenser
>> world bibliography], linkable to the text of a potentially online
>> Spenser
>> text [Oxford?], is an incredibly exciting notion. It would represent a
>> true
>> leap in the discipline, and one wonders how difficult it would be to
>> establish, as long as the text of the SE is still available in digitized
>> form. I wince at the pathetically limited material on Spenser on
>> Wikipedia,
>> for example, where so many students go to for an initial treatment. How
>> much
>> better would our student research would become if they had the SE
>> available
>> online. How much more useful to us to have a resource that would
>> updatable
>> and ongoing, rather than held in stasis in 1990.
>>
>> Bruce Danner
>> St. Lawrence University
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "A.C. Hamilton"
>> Sent: Apr 19, 2010 2:31 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> <[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Marks & Spenser
>>
>> *Upon returning to the world -- that is, upon getting out of hospital ?
>> I
>> was surprised and pleased to find comments on my reference to the Marks
>> &
>> Spenser article. Surprised because I had thought that I was writing a
>> private memo and pleased to have prompted praise of the never-too-much
>> read
>> Spenser Encyclopedia, and especially Andrew?s verse. Yet I am aware that
>> the
>> volume is now twenty years out of date and needs to be replaced. It
>> served
>> its function in the late twentieth century as the Variorum served an
>> earlier
>> generation. When it is replaced, I hope it will be replaced by something
>> close to the Wikipedia that may be continuously revised, made up-to-date
>> and
>> improved. The existence of this Forum shows that a new and better SE is
>> possible. Bert
>> *
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Hannibal Hamlin
> Associate Professor of English
> Editor, Reformation
> Organizer, The King James Bible and its Cultural Afterlife
> http://kingjamesbible.osu.edu/
> The Ohio State University
> 164 West 17th Ave., 421 Denney Hall
> Columbus, OH 43210-1340
> [log in to unmask]
> [log in to unmask]
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager