People knew instinctively that the Stones' satanic thing was show
business - ironic of course, because it was the Beatles who were
looked on as being more Show Business while the Stones were the rebels
etc. But Lennon was something else of course - far more a rebel deep
down than any of the Stones.
Tim A.
On 21 Apr 2010, at 19:12, Douglas Barbour wrote:
> It's interesting that since the Stones merely alluded to their
> Satanic connections, it was just accepted, while the Beatles, making
> a different claim, got into all that trouble (of course, maybe those
> nice xtian youth had not even bought any Stones albums, whereas they
> had & loved their Beatles ones).
|