I don't think it's unworthy, just that most of it sees itself as being radically different than, say, Joyce or Stein. There seems to be a compulsion "to make it new" for the sake of it. I see no inherent merit in newness per se.
Original Message:
I guess I dont disagree, but I think we're getting the feeling that
you feel that everything afterwards lacks something, isnt as worthy?
Perhaps that's what we're not quite agreeing with?
|