Someone looked at it, so I was spurred to do some more... :-)
The RDF is now much cleaner, with URIs for the interesting things.
(And with the text search.)
Sindice seems to have indexed it already off the sitemap (well done guys!).
I even did a tiny bit of linking (A* sources from A to Annals) to dbpedia which might give a sense of where we might do more (or someone else?).
Try:
http://sameas.org/?uri=http://dbpedia.org/resource/Annals_of_Mathematics
And if you were really ambitious, and wanted to find out what your favourite ISSN is rated, you could use: :-)
http://era.rkbexplorer.com/sparql/?format=browse&query=PREFIX+id%3A+++%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fera.rkbexplorer.com%2Fid%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+rdf%3A++%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F1999%2F02%2F22-rdf-syntax-ns%23%3E%0D%0APREFIX+rdfs%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2F01%2Frdf-schema%23%3E%0D%0A%0D%0ASELECT+%3Flabel+%3Fname+WHERE+%7B+%3Fissn+rdfs%3Alabel+%22urn%3AISSN%3A1746-8256%22+.+%3Fjournal+id%3Aissn+%3Fissn+.+%3Fjournal+rdfs%3Alabel+%3Fname+.+%3Fjournal+id%3Arank+%3Frank+.+%3Frank+rdfs%3Alabel+%3Flabel%7D+%0D%0A%0D%0A
Or in a little more readable syntax:
PREFIX id: <http://era.rkbexplorer.com/id/>
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
SELECT ?label ?name WHERE { ?issn rdfs:label "urn:ISSN:1746-8256" . ?journal id:issn ?issn . ?journal rdfs:label ?name . ?journal id:rank ?rank . ?rank rdfs:label ?label}
Best
Hugh
On 31/03/2010 21:25, "Chris Rusbridge" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Thanks Hugh. So I checked and found
> http://era.rkbexplorer.com/description/ERAID-41868... and it appears we got an
> A! Brill...
>
> --
> Chris Rusbridge
> Director, Digital Curation Centre
> Email: [log in to unmask] Phone 0131 6513823
> University of Edinburgh
> Appleton Tower, Crichton St, Edinburgh EH8 9LE
>
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with
> registration number SC005336.
>
>
>
> On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:02, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>
>> Oh dear - someone will kill me.
>> http://era.rkbexplorer.com/
>>
>> Typical http://era.rkbexplorer.com/id/ERAID-15590
>>
>> OK - this is the simplest possible, naïve, sort-of Linked Data version of
>> it.
>> Please be gentle with me, I'm just trying to be helpful.
>>
>> Hugh
>>
>> On 31/03/2010 13:09, "Chris Rusbridge" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Arthur, any chance of persuading them to publish their data other than in
>>> Excel or Zip form? Downloading a file is fine if one wants to make extensive
>>> use of it, but if one only wants to check something, it's not so brilliant.
>>>
>>> A simple HTML list would be OK, RDF even better?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chris Rusbridge
>>> Director, Digital Curation Centre
>>> Email: [log in to unmask] Phone 0131 6513823
>>> University of Edinburgh
>>> Appleton Tower, Crichton St, Edinburgh EH8 9LE
>>>
>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland,
>>> with
>>> registration number SC005336.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 31 Mar 2010, at 00:38, Arthur Sale wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have been waiting for the Australian Government to post to these lists,
>>>> but
>>>> they haven¹t.
>>>>
>>>> So let me advise you that the Australian Research Council (ARC) has
>>>> published
>>>> its definitive lists of ranked journals used by Australians, and ranked
>>>> conferences in selected disciplines. I emphasize that (a) these are lists
>>>> relevant to Australians, and (b) the verb Œused¹ conveys the proper
>>>> relationship between author and publisher. The Journal of the American
>>>> Beaver
>>>> or the International Journal of Up-Helly-Aa are unlikely to appear (if they
>>>> exist). Though they might be in the list if we have an Australian
>>>> researcher
>>>> working in these fields. Australians are rather eclectic in where they
>>>> publish (3% of the world¹s research). There is in fact very little local!
>>>>
>>>> Please point your browser to the ARC¹s page on ranked outlets
>>>> http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_journal_list.htm. Warning: if you download
>>>> the
>>>> files on this page they are fairly big. But invaluable.
>>>>
>>>> The rankings were developed after a two-year consultation with Australia¹s
>>>> professional societies (and their members) and the Academies (important
>>>> Australians in several groupings eg Science, Humanities).
>>>>
>>>> Note that the journals are ranked A+, A, B. C and only the first two
>>>> categories are regarded as important. They are likely to be internationally
>>>> relevant. Bs and Cs will contain most of the local stuff. Publishers will
>>>> dispute rankings of course and the C category is no doubt missing many
>>>> which
>>>> are irrelevant to us.
>>>>
>>>> Conferences are ranked A, B, C with A regarded as important. Only selected
>>>> disciplines have ranked conferences (eg computer science) where these are
>>>> regarded as important research outlets as journals.
>>>>
>>>> Arthur
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
|