Hi Mark,
Caret is putting an extension in the file. fslstats -R gives 0.000000
74409981039121866167130168540266496.000000 on a file that contains only 0s
and 1s (an ROI file), so I am assuming it is not okay either. When I remove
the extension from the file then FSLView and fslstats work normally.
Thanks,
Matt.
-----Original Message-----
From: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Mark Jenkinson
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:06 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [FSL] FSLView (and perhaps other FSL tools) do not respect
vox_offset
Hi,
Are you using an extension, or just modifying the vox_offset?
Can you also test some command line programs (e.g. fslhd, fslstats) to
see if they are OK or not with your files.
All the best,
Mark
On 19 Apr 2010, at 18:01, Matt Glasser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed that FSLView (and perhaps other FSL tools) do not
> respect vox_offesets different from 352 bytes. This results in
> loading files that are misaligned with garbage in the first few rows
> of the matrix. Supporting different values of vox_offset would help
> make FSL more interoperable with other softwares like Caret that use
> this feature of
NIFTI:http://nifti.nimh.nih.gov/nifti-1/documentation/faq#Q21
> I am aware it is possible to strip out the header extension to get
> files to load with FSL, though.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt.
|