yep. in that case there should be no difference to the siemens vectors. is there?
cheers-
andreas
________________________________________
Von: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [[log in to unmask]] im Auftrag von Martin Reiss-Zimmermann [[log in to unmask]]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. April 2010 21:57
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: [FSL] AW: [FSL] AW: [FSL] which bvecs to trust?
Hello back,
I planned the DTI-sequence "transversal", so that there was no angulation - I just had to offcenter the stack to examine the head itself (but that didn't result in angulation of the stack).
Or is it something else you meant and I didn't understand?
greetz,
Martin
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:57:39 +0200, Andreas Bartsch <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>good. How many degrees was the angulation of the axial plane? This is important to know in order to see if Siemens did rotate the header entries for the bvecs.
>I suggest you run a test on a strongly angulated phantom and keep us posted.
>Cheers-
>Andreas
>
>________________________________________
>Von: FSL - FMRIB's Software Library [[log in to unmask]] im Auftrag von Martin Reiss-Zimmermann [[log in to unmask]]
>Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. April 2010 07:08
>An: [log in to unmask]
>Betreff: Re: [FSL] AW: [FSL] which bvecs to trust?
>
>Hello Martin,
>
>here are the bvec and bval files computed by MRIconvert and dcm2nii on a MAC and a PC. I also added the Siemens table.
>
>greetings, Martin
|