Hi Stewart, sorry for mis-spelling your forename, should know it by now!
Cheers.
John.
John Gregory
Programme Leader - Accessibility and Inclusive Design
School of the Built Environment
University of Salford
Eml. [log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Stewart McGough
Sent: 28 April 2010 16:31
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Part M and change of use
Hi
Part m requires 1 in 20 or any part thereof. BS8300 applies slightly more
onerous criteria.
Under B Reg M you provide an access statement stating that the spatial
limitations in squeezing 3 bedrooms into the existing shell preclude the
provision of a Part m wheelchair access toilet/ shower. Building Control in
approving this will accept no responsibility for DDA claims against the
service provider.
However by not providing an accessible room anywhere in the hotel the
service provider will be at risk under the DDA.
To avoid the risk is it possible to design 1 room with a wheelchair access
toilet /shower within a tighter footprint than the AD M model?
Alternatively is it worth considering reducing the fit out to 2 ensuite
rooms at least one of which would provide space within the bedroom and
ensuite for comfortable wheelchair access?
This is a client risk assessment situation.
Stewart McGough
Regional Manager - Access Consultancy
Aedas
Building Consultancy | Architecture | Imaging |
Interiors | R&D | Urban Design & Landscape
21 St Mary's Street, Shrewsbury SY1 1ED, UK
T +44 (0)1743 283 000
F +44 (0)1743 232 717
E [log in to unmask]
W www.aedas.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Alan Hunt
Sent: 28 April 2010 16:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Part M and change of use
Hi All
I have been asked to advise on a change of use application from a guest
house accommodation provider. They want to convert an old, stand alone,
stone outbuildiing into extra bedroom accommodation with ensuite facilities.
The 3 units are very small and although the entrances etc will be level and
accessible there is not room for any of the bedrooms to have an accessible
shower room / toilet measuring 2.4m x 2.5m. as per Part M. The developer
is keen to provide an eccessible facility but the design submitted is just
too small to be of use to a wheelchair user for instance and there is no
scope to enlarge within the existing outbuilding. BS8300 suggests 1 bedroom
in 20 should be accessible but does give a minimum number (eg 1) this guest
house has less than 15 rooms.
The problem is the change of use criteria which states that all such work
shall be carried out as is necessary to ensure that the building complies
with the applicable requirements of Schedule 1.
any advice gratefully received.
regards
alan
----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
This message has been virus scanned by Sophos PureMessage.
----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
|