JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SOCIAL-POLICY Archives


SOCIAL-POLICY Archives

SOCIAL-POLICY Archives


SOCIAL-POLICY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SOCIAL-POLICY Home

SOCIAL-POLICY Home

SOCIAL-POLICY  March 2010

SOCIAL-POLICY March 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

UNICEF consultancy: children and social protection in Laos

From:

"N.Yeates" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

N.Yeates

Date:

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:21:09 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (92 lines)

Dear colleagues,

I have been asked to circulate this ToR relating to a current UNICEF consultancy on children and social protection in Laos. Please do not reply to me but directly to  Mizuho Okimoto-Kaewtathip at UNICEF (Asia): [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Many thanks, Nicola.
[DRAFT]

UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN’S FUND

Terms of Reference for Consultant on Social Protection study


 1.  Background & Purpose:

While the positive strides made by countries, especially in the Asia region, have accelerated the global economic growth, the recent global economic crisis has once again, alerted the public on the uneven impact across the various strata of the society. The vulnerabilities of the marginalised population evidently reaffirmed that the fruits of development have been inequitably distributed, high levels of poverty continue to persist, and that public policies may not necessarily be in place to prevent the near-poor population from spiraling down to poverty. Indeed, the economic, social and environmental changes have brought about intensified forms of vulnerabilities and risks as well as inequalities and exclusion. As such, the emerging needs are no longer met by conventional approaches to social protection as a temporary risk mitigation mechanism, but require comprehensive, sustainable and rights-based approaches that can generate a wider impact.

The adverse multiplier effects of globalisation on investment in social development, employment opportunities, changes in market price and household coping mechanisms can have grave impact on the overall development outcomes but especially on children due to their unique vulnerabilities. As the preliminary findings of the Child Well-Being Study has highlighted, the missed opportunities in the early years of life for example through the disruption in access to basic social services such as education and health would have detrimental impact on a child’s development not only today but throughout the life time. The reduction in household income and changes in market price, will inevitably change the household consumption patterns but the implications may differ among the household members such that children may be consuming less food products or those with less nutritional value, withdrawn from schools and receive less health care. Global research confirms that poverty is most likely transferred down to the next generation, and thus the investment in the young generation is an imperative to human development at all times through various means including social protection systems.

While the impact of the global economic crisis in Lao PDR is known to be subdued, there is insufficient evidence due to the lack of real-time monitoring systems and recent major national-scale social indicator surveys. However, the impact of such global crisis is likely to only gradually surface and other more relevant major external shocks to household livelihoods in Lao PDR may include natural disasters and access to land. Nevertheless, chronic poverty persists and affects a large number of children in the country, and such external shocks could drive even a larger number of children to unsustainable levels. Thus, the potential implications of children should be well understood in order to analyse the existing policy framework and to identify ways to mitigate the impact of such shocks. The Government of Lao PDR is considering social protection as one of the priorities in the proposed 7th National Socio-Economic Development Plan (NSEDP).


 1.  Objectives of the exercise:


 *   As a follow-up to the Child Well-Being Study that identified the characteristics of vulnerabilities experienced by children, review the policy framework and programmes on social protection, basic social services and investment in social development, social transfers (e.g. Poverty Reduction Fund, Village Development Fund etc.), and analyse the implications on children.
 *   Take stock of existing good practices (e.g. those that are being initiated through sectoral work supported by UNICEF) that can be systematically scaled up.
 *   Introduce cutting-edge approaches to social protection by presenting the concept of Child-Sensitive Social Protection in the context of Lao PDR to the Government and facilitate a policy-level dialogue on the issue with a view to provide inputs to the 7th National Socio-Economic Development Plan.
 *   Contribute to the knowledge generation among UN agencies and IFIs and strengthen partnerships in this field, including through the CCA/UNDAF process.
 *   Facilitate various policy dialogue through publication of a policy brief and paper on child- sensitive social protection in the context of Lao PDR with recommendations on how to implement this.


 1.  Methodology:

•         Desk review of secondary data on existing policies and programmes to analyse the potential implications on children.
•         Interviews with officials in relevant Government partners, UN agencies, IFIs and UNICEF programme sections.
•         Field visits to validate and observe systems of social protection as necessary.
•         Consultation meeting involving relevant stakeholders to share the preliminary findings.


 1.  Schedule of Tasks & Timeline:
Responsibilities and tasks:

Week 1 and 2 (10 working days)
Orientation and desk reviews of key documents related to social protection as well as meetings with Chief of Sections.
Development of methodology for data collection as well as protocols and instruments for research.

Presentation of research framework to UNICEF staff and key partners in Government, UN agencies and IFIs.

Meetings and interviews with key Government partners, UN agencies, IFIs and other relevant partners.

      Week 3 and 4 (10 working days)
      Report writing

      Week 5 (5 working days)
      Internal discussions with the programme sections, consultation meeting with partners and submission of the final report and policy brief.


 1.  Deliverables:

• 100 % upon submission of:

o    Concept note with research plan, methodology and draft outline of the report

o    15-page final report

o    2-page policy brief

o    Background note for ADB-UNICEF regional conference on social protection

o    Presentations

o    Report on consultation meeting

o    Archive of reference documents



 1.  Qualifications & Experience required:

• Background in economics, public policy and social development.
• Over 10 years of experience in a relevant field, including in capacity development of Governments.
• Knowledge of Child-Sensitive Social Protection approach and other cutting-edge research trends on social protection.
• Publication in relevant field, including articles published in internationally recognised journals.
• Ability to write concise policy advocacy document.
• Ability to communicate succinctly and strategically, and also facilitate policy-level dialogue.
• Familiarity with the UN and UNICEF in particular.
• Ability and commitment to meet deadlines.


-- 
The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager