'ludic' is good, Mark; yes, at play in the fields of text....
Doug
On 17-Mar-10, at 8:46 AM, Mark Weiss wrote:
> How about "serious or ludic reader"? There aren't so many customers
> that we can afford to leave any out.
Douglas Barbour
[log in to unmask]
http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
Latest books:
Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
Wednesdays'
http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
The secret
which got lost neither hides
nor reveals itself, it shows forth
tokens.
Charles Olson
|