Oh dear - someone will kill me.
http://era.rkbexplorer.com/
Typical http://era.rkbexplorer.com/id/ERAID-15590
OK - this is the simplest possible, naïve, sort-of Linked Data version of
it.
Please be gentle with me, I'm just trying to be helpful.
Hugh
On 31/03/2010 13:09, "Chris Rusbridge" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Arthur, any chance of persuading them to publish their data other than in
> Excel or Zip form? Downloading a file is fine if one wants to make extensive
> use of it, but if one only wants to check something, it's not so brilliant.
>
> A simple HTML list would be OK, RDF even better?
>
> --
> Chris Rusbridge
> Director, Digital Curation Centre
> Email: [log in to unmask] Phone 0131 6513823
> University of Edinburgh
> Appleton Tower, Crichton St, Edinburgh EH8 9LE
>
> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with
> registration number SC005336.
>
>
>
> On 31 Mar 2010, at 00:38, Arthur Sale wrote:
>
>> I have been waiting for the Australian Government to post to these lists, but
>> they havenıt.
>>
>> So let me advise you that the Australian Research Council (ARC) has published
>> its definitive lists of ranked journals used by Australians, and ranked
>> conferences in selected disciplines. I emphasize that (a) these are lists
>> relevant to Australians, and (b) the verb usedı conveys the proper
>> relationship between author and publisher. The Journal of the American Beaver
>> or the International Journal of Up-Helly-Aa are unlikely to appear (if they
>> exist). Though they might be in the list if we have an Australian researcher
>> working in these fields. Australians are rather eclectic in where they
>> publish (3% of the worldıs research). There is in fact very little local!
>>
>> Please point your browser to the ARCıs page on ranked outlets
>> http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_journal_list.htm. Warning: if you download the
>> files on this page they are fairly big. But invaluable.
>>
>> The rankings were developed after a two-year consultation with Australiaıs
>> professional societies (and their members) and the Academies (important
>> Australians in several groupings eg Science, Humanities).
>>
>> Note that the journals are ranked A+, A, B. C and only the first two
>> categories are regarded as important. They are likely to be internationally
>> relevant. Bs and Cs will contain most of the local stuff. Publishers will
>> dispute rankings of course and the C category is no doubt missing many which
>> are irrelevant to us.
>>
>> Conferences are ranked A, B, C with A regarded as important. Only selected
>> disciplines have ranked conferences (eg computer science) where these are
>> regarded as important research outlets as journals.
>>
>> Arthur
>>
>>
|