my apologies, would not wish to bring the list into disrepute or cause problems.
On 22 March 2010 15:12, D E <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> : |
>
>
> please can we remind folk that
>
> (a) posters here don't know who's on the list as a lurker, so don't assume
> that anyone being criticised is not reading what is written here, nor
> perhaps one of their pupils is a reader here, and is forwarding it to anyone
> else
> (b) opinions are fine when stated as such but *academic* opinions are
> better, otherwise it reduces to an unrecoverable Blur are better than Oasis
> kind of debate (perhaps showing my age here)
>
> this is a tiny criticism at this level of comment about Mr KC, but we did
> once have to close the list when more severe (and unpleasant,
> unsubstantiated) material was posted about a 'name' magician that was
> arguably libelous, and that is something we need to avoid
>
> cheers
> Dave E
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jake Stratton-Kent"
> <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 10:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [ACADEMIC-STUDY-MAGIC] Time article dealing with magic at the
> state level
>
>
>> On 22 March 2010 09:00, Jez <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> And separate myself from King Kev.
>>
>> oh where ignorance is bliss...
>>
>> I'd managed to get thru' life thus far unaware of this prat's
>> existence, google fu before breakfast shd carry a health warning.
>>
>> Come back Alex, all is forgiven!
>>
>
|