Commit summary from repository starlink
------------------------------------
(Ed Chapin) smurf: quality now exported with any 3d model component
5.9% applications/smurf/examples/
94.0% applications/smurf/libsmf/
(Ed Chapin) smurf: fix an accounting error in smf_qualstats_report
100.0% applications/smurf/libsmf/
(Ed Chapin) smurf: whitespace / formatting
100.0% applications/smurf/libsmf/
(Ed Chapin) smurf: slightly weaker DC step-finding
100.0% applications/smurf/examples/
(Ed Chapin) smurf: display quality report both before and after pre-processing
100.0% applications/smurf/libsmf/
(Ed Chapin) smurf: whitespace cleanup
100.0% applications/smurf/libsmf/
Commits from repository starlink
-----------------------------
commit 821f6ab8d4e382afdb96a9e7e2de65837342ffb2
Author: Ed Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue Mar 30 17:07:37 2010 -0700
smurf: quality now exported with any 3d model component
Re-jigged the logic for attaching quality to exported model
components. Now any model component with the same dimensions
as the residual (i.e. 3d data cube) will have quality attached...
as long as 'qua' is specified in exportndf in the dimmconfig file.
applications/smurf/examples/dimmconfig.lis | 9 +-
applications/smurf/libsmf/Makefile.am | 1 +
applications/smurf/libsmf/smf.h.source | 3 +
applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_iteratemap.c | 22 ++++-
applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_samedims_smfData.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
commit 4da0ae3e3d1c600a40dbebe5071b62944171f931
Author: Ed Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue Mar 30 15:36:02 2010 -0700
smurf: fix an accounting error in smf_qualstats_report
The reason BADDA and BADBOL were reporting different numbers of
total flagged bolometers is because BADBOL flags *every* sample,
whereas BADDA skips the padding at the start and end of a time
series. Therefore the total number of samples flagged BADDA
must be divided by the total time slices minus the padding to
correctly count bolometers.
applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_qualstats_report.c | 23 +++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
commit 26304b20b88d6ecb5d1d11d1ab2e2ff184a0e220
Author: Ed Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue Mar 30 14:43:53 2010 -0700
smurf: whitespace / formatting
applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_update_quality.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
commit 578a20a7def5a45d362acc87bb599e239750a79b
Author: Ed Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue Mar 30 14:25:31 2010 -0700
smurf: slightly weaker DC step-finding
Looking at blank-field data, erroneous DC steps were being found
in many locations during the pre-processing. Backing off the
threshold to 5-sigma from 2-sigma seems to be much better. For
the faint dimmconfig, it can safely iteratively identify
down to 3-sigma steps in the much flatter residual.
applications/smurf/examples/dimmconfig.lis | 2 +-
applications/smurf/examples/dimmconfig_faint.lis | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
commit 93945bcbd0094bbe4dfae1fc5a1d6fcad0cd60b3
Author: Ed Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue Mar 30 14:24:10 2010 -0700
smurf: display quality report both before and after pre-processing
applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_iteratemap.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
commit 1369705cd22a5e461763a03d2b764549abcbb087
Author: Ed Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue Mar 30 10:45:44 2010 -0700
smurf: whitespace cleanup
applications/smurf/libsmf/smf_filter_execute.c | 86 +++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
|