On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:28:38AM +0100, Bernard Vatant wrote:
> My 2 cents as a practitioner re-using frequently in customers' OWL
> ontologies elements from dcterms, I have each time to introduce their
> re-definition as OWL object or datatype properties.
> Actually this redinition is somehow automatic for object properties at least
> when introducing them through an ontology editor such as Protégé.
> I would definitely be more comfortable with such a definition being present
> in DCMI specification providing an OWL view of dcterms ontology.
Thank you, Bernard - I'll use this to start a list of reasons!
Tom
--
Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>
|