On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 09:34 -0800, Catherine Daly wrote:
> even the use of workflow seems to be different
Angel did answer my question and it does seem that something as clumsy
and crude as a wacom is still the best available.
What did surprise me very much was how quickly black and white film ran
into the limits of digital imaging. So I got sidetracked from the
initial question of if a wacom is a better option.
Anyways thanks for the comments. I perhaps should not have assumed that
someone who is able to not only use but also manipulate multiple
perspectives on a 4x5 monorail is also able to understand the limits of
8 bit screen images produced by gimp. It seems to me that cine paint may
be the only option, should I continue with the idea.
And I have told CEOs what to do. That was my day job. If they don't
listen they find themselves looking for someone else. The joke in
Angel's first post with that URL is that the first rejected design is
actually the far better design to the drab and boring latest website
fashion cliché. I trust I can assume this is understood.
best cj
(ps. and it is not wise to assume someone has less experience then you.)
|