Dear Hideaki,
We're about to use option 3, as we cannot control how our users
discover e-resources and authenticate themselves.
Kind regards,
Dom Benson
--
[log in to unmask]
Electronic Resources Librarian
Brunel University Library, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK, UB8 3PH
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for Shibboleth developments
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of NODA Hideaki
Sent: 09 February 2010 13:03
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [JISC-SHIBBOLETH] EZProxy v. Shibboleth?
Dear all;
Our UPKI-fed, the Japanese access management federation, regards that
SSO for e-resources is the most persuasive merit of Shibboleth for
librarians.
However, we feel some difficulties to promote our federation only with
this
insistence.
As same as in UK, there are many universities in Japan which
use EZProxy as a tool of SSO for their libraries' e-resources.
Considering Shibboleth as a tool for SSO, some of them claim that
it is difficult to find any significant advantage over their
EZProxy-based SSO systems.
Then, how do you think the merit / demerit of...
1) Shibboleth-only SSO service,
2) Non-Shibbolized EZProxy-based SSO,
3) Hybrid SSO with Shibboleth and Shibbolized EZProxy ?
Please show us your opinions.
Best wishes;
Hideaki
------------------------
NODA, Hideaki
Chiba University Library
Public service division.
Tel: (+81)43 290 2258
Fax: (+81)43 290 2266
Mail: [log in to unmask]
-------------------------
http://www.ll.chiba-u.ac.jp/
http://mitizane.ll.chiba-u.jp/curator/
|