Hi,
I downloaded the lastest - 4.1.5 for Max OS X. I can successfully get it to run when installed locally to /usr/local/fsl. However, if I drop it on a netgear readynas NAS device and do all appropriate .bashrc/.bash_profile changes, then executables like fslview fail.
Here is my session:
bash-3.2$ printenv FSLDIR
/Volumes/ALS/Software/fsl
bash-3.2$ fslview
dyld: Library not loaded: @executable_path/../Frameworks/libqt-mt.3.dylib
Referenced from: /Volumes/ALS/Software/fsl/bin/fslview.app/Contents/MacOS/fslview
Reason: no suitable image found. Did find:
/Volumes/ALS/Software/fsl/bin/fslview.app/Contents/Frameworks/libqt-mt.3.dylib: unknown file type, first eight bytes: 0x6C 0x69 0x62 0x71 0x74 0x2D 0x6D 0x74
/Volumes/ALS/Software/fsl/bin/fslview.app/Contents/MacOS/../Frameworks/libqt-mt.3.dylib: unknown file type, first eight bytes: 0x6C 0x69 0x62 0x71 0x74 0x2D 0x6D 0x74
/Volumes/ALS/Software/fsl/bin/fslview.app/Contents/MacOS/../Frameworks/libqt-mt.3.dylib: unknown file type, first eight bytes: 0x6C 0x69 0x62 0x71 0x74 0x2D 0x6D 0x74
/Volumes/ALS/Software/fsl/bin/fslview: line 7: 14158 Trace/BPT trap ${FSLDIR}/bin/fslview.app/Contents/MacOS/fslview $@
I've tracked this down to an interaction between soft links and the netgear device. So yes, this is not explicitly the responsibility of the fsl programming group etc. As a work around I think if I just remove the softlinks and explicitly rename the dynamic libraries to what is being accessed then this should work.
Given that, any possibly way to get a list of the soft link commands that are processed during the make of the distribution.
This was not an issue with version 4.0.x
Thanks,
Robert Welsh
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Robert C. Welsh, PhD
Research Assistant Professor
Departments of Radiology and Psychiatry
University of Michigan
(734) - 764 - 8541 (fax)
(734) - 647 - 6781 (Ofc)
rcwelsh @ med.umich.edu
>>> Reza Salimi 02/19/10 8:13 AM >>>
Hi Marisa,
the cluster inference in feat in cluster-based or cluster-size-based
inference (using the parametric random-field-theory-based test of
significance).
Feat does not do a cluster-mass inference, so that you can use randomise
(the other tool in FSL, which is capable of nonparametric tests) in case you
need that test.
There are also new parametric methods for
cluster-massinference
that you might like to look at, but unfortunately, they are not
part of FSL (yet).
Best, Reza
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Marisa Loitfelder <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a short question concerning Feat/Post-stats:
> The default setting for analyses is"clusterwise", and I was wandering
> whether it is
> "cluster size" or "cluster mass", because I found the difference on the
> homepage.
> Further, is there a possibility to switch between these two options in the
> GUI?
>
> Regards,
> Marisa
>
--
Reza Salimi-Khorshidi,
DPhil Candidate, Dept. of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford (Linacre
College).
[log in to unmask]
FMRIB Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU
Tel: +44 (0) 1865 222466 Fax: +44 (0)1865 222717
**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
|