On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 15:18 +0000, Laurie Miles wrote:
> ...due to (what
> appears to me) to be poor design of the C&B software (e.g. some content on web
> pages is provided from a non-secure server).
I have yet to see anything in C&B, particularly its interface and the
strange choices of words in it and the documents it generates, which is
anything other than bad in design.
And I've looked.
The names of the people who specified, developed, wrote, and accepted
the software should be published and remembered.
--
A
|