On 4 February 2010 09:57, Paul Caldwell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> perhaps the danger is that without money, and it costs a lot, to train up
> those who have some aspect of their performance below par (none of us are
> perfect dont forget), then it will be cheaper to get rid via the GMC of
> them. PCTs will find it cheaper and quicker to refer doctors to the GMC to
> get rid of them so they can employ cheaper, younger, keener and more
> compliant doctors from europe.
The ones with special expertise in diamorphine administration? </cheap jibe>
But it seems that the cost of remediation for below-par hospital
doctors will have to be paid for by the NHS, and the potential cost of
this is said to be causing some disquiet among the Great and Good.
Which will put them in an Interesting Position: having said so
vehemently that the public needs revalidation for safety's sake, then
expense should surely be no object.
--
Michael Leuty
Nottingham, UK
|