JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ASQUS Archives


ASQUS Archives

ASQUS Archives


ASQUS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ASQUS Home

ASQUS Home

ASQUS  January 2010

ASQUS January 2010

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Some recent articles of potential interest to list members

From:

Andrew Booth <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Advice and Support in QUalitative evidence Synthesis <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:52:41 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (868 lines)

J Health Serv Res Policy. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'J Health 
Serv Res Policy.');> 2010 Jan;15(1):47-55.


  Community professionals' management of client care: a mixed-methods
  systematic review.

Kolehmainen N 
</pubmed?term=%22Kolehmainen%20N%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Francis J 
</pubmed?term=%22Francis%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Duncan E 
</pubmed?term=%22Duncan%20E%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Fraser C 
</pubmed?term=%22Fraser%20C%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. 
[log in to unmask]

OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on individual community 
professionals' caseload management (behaviours related to assessment, 
treatment and discharging of clients) to identify the main themes and 
concepts, and to synthesize the findings to inform practice, policy and 
research. METHODS: Publications were systematically identified from 
electronic databases, hand searches of bibliographies, and contact with 
professional organizations. There were no restrictions on language, the 
nature of publications or publication year. Procedures were 
systematically applied for quality appraisal and data extraction. 
Qualitative and descriptive quantitative methods were used for data 
analysis and synthesis. RESULTS: Search criteria yielded 2048 papers of 
which 42 papers met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-five percent of these 
were based on research, the rest on professionals' experiences. The 
papers covered 16 professional and 20 client populations, and their 
quality was generally poor. Analysis identified six broad themes: 
definitions of caseload management, caseload measurement and 'tools', 
models of caseload management practice, client-professional 
relationship, discharging and professional guidance. Six papers 
presented issues that related to but did not fit within these themes. 
Current caseload management tools and models of caseload management 
practice had a poor evidence base. Five papers described benefits of 
team-based approaches. Professional guidance for caseload management is 
limited in detail and relevance to daily practice. CONCLUSIONS: Although 
there is a considerable literature on caseload management, it is not 
possible to make summative conclusions. Policy-makers and professional 
bodies should encourage and support development of research evidence 
about the ways to achieve effective, efficient and equitable caseload 
management. Health and social care services considering implementing 
caseload management tools or models of practice should critically 
appraise their basis, and consider their potential advantages as well as 
disadvantages.

PMID: 20071502 [PubMed - in process] 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


BMC Public Health. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'BMC Public 
Health.');> 2009 Dec 11;9:458.


  The expressed needs of people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic
  encephalomyelitis: a systematic review.

Drachler Mde L 
</pubmed?term=%22Drachler%20Mde%20L%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Leite JC 
</pubmed?term=%22Leite%20JC%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Hooper L 
</pubmed?term=%22Hooper%20L%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Hong CS 
</pubmed?term=%22Hong%20CS%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Pheby D 
</pubmed?term=%22Pheby%20D%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Nacul L 
</pubmed?term=%22Nacul%20L%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Lacerda E 
</pubmed?term=%22Lacerda%20E%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Campion P 
</pubmed?term=%22Campion%20P%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Killett A 
</pubmed?term=%22Killett%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
McArthur M 
</pubmed?term=%22McArthur%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Poland F 
</pubmed?term=%22Poland%20F%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

School of Allied Health Professions, University of East Anglia, Norwich, 
NR4 7TJ, UK. [log in to unmask]

BACKGROUND: We aimed to review systematically the needs for support in 
managing illness and maintaining social inclusion expressed by people 
with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) 
METHODS: We carried out a systematic review of primary research and 
personal ('own') stories expressing the needs of people with CFS/ME. 
Structured searches were carried out on Medline, AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, 
ASSIA, CENTRAL, and other health, social and legal databases from 
inception to November 2007. Study inclusion, data extraction and risk of 
bias were assessed independently in duplicate. Expressed needs were 
tabulated and a conceptual framework developed through an iterative 
process. RESULTS: Thirty two quantitative and qualitative studies, 
including the views of over 2500 people with CFS/ME with mainly moderate 
or severe illness severity, met the inclusion criteria. The following 
major support needs emerged: 1) The need to make sense of symptoms and 
gain diagnosis, 2) for respect and empathy from service providers, 3) 
for positive attitudes and support from family and friends, 4) for 
information on CFS/ME, 5) to adjust views and priorities, 6) to develop 
strategies to manage impairments and activity limitations, and 7) to 
develop strategies to maintain/regain social participation. CONCLUSIONS: 
Although the studies were heterogeneous, there was consistent evidence 
that substantial support is needed to rebuild lives. Gaining support 
depends - most importantly - on the ability of providers of health and 
social care, colleagues, friends and relatives, and those providing 
educational and leisure services, to understand and respond to those needs.

PMID: 20003363 [PubMed - in process]

PMCID: PMC27994

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Acad Med. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'Acad Med.');> 2009 
Dec;84(12):1775-87.


  Residents' and attending physicians' handoffs: a systematic review of
  the literature.

Riesenberg LA 
</pubmed?term=%22Riesenberg%20LA%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Leitzsch J 
</pubmed?term=%22Leitzsch%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Massucci JL 
</pubmed?term=%22Massucci%20JL%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Jaeger J 
</pubmed?term=%22Jaeger%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Rosenfeld JC 
</pubmed?term=%22Rosenfeld%20JC%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Patow C 
</pubmed?term=%22Patow%20C%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Padmore JS 
</pubmed?term=%22Padmore%20JS%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Karpovich KP 
</pubmed?term=%22Karpovich%20KP%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware 19718, USA. 
[log in to unmask]

PURPOSE: Effective communication is central to patient safety. There is 
abundant evidence of negative consequences of poor communication and 
inadequate handoffs. The purpose of the current study was to conduct a 
systematic review of articles focused on physicians' handoffs, conduct a 
qualitative review of barriers and strategies, and identify features of 
structured handoffs that have been effective. METHOD: The authors 
conducted a thorough, systematic review of English-language articles, 
indexed in PubMed, published between 1987 and June 2008, and focused on 
physicians' handoffs in the United States. The search strategy yielded 
2,590 articles. After title review, 401 were obtained for further review 
by trained abstractors. RESULTS: Forty-six articles met inclusion 
criteria, 33 (71.7%) of which were published between 2005 and 2008. 
Content analysis yielded 91 handoffs barriers in eight major categories 
and 140 handoffs strategies in seven major categories. Eighteen articles 
involved research on handoffs. Quality assessment scores for research 
studies ranged from 1 to 13 (possible range 1-16). One third of the 
reviewed research studies obtained quality scores at or below 8, and 
only one achieved a score of 13. Only six studies included any measure 
of handoff effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the negative consequences 
of inadequate physicians' handoffs, very little research has been done 
to identify best practices. Many of the existing peer-reviewed studies 
had design or reporting flaws. There is remarkable consistency in the 
anecdotally suggested strategies; however, there remains a paucity of 
evidence to support these strategies. Overall, there is a great need for 
high-quality handoff outcomes studies focused on systems factors, human 
performance, and the effectiveness of structured protocols and 
interventions.

PMID: 19940588 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

J Gen Intern Med. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'J Gen Intern 
Med.');> 2010 Jan;25(1):72-8. Epub 2009 Nov 19.


  A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and
  characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine.

Sambunjak D 
</pubmed?term=%22Sambunjak%20D%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Straus SE 
</pubmed?term=%22Straus%20SE%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Marusic A 
</pubmed?term=%22Marusic%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

Croatian Medical Journal, Zagreb, Croatia.

BACKGROUND: Mentorship is perceived to play a significant role in the 
career development and productivity of academic clinicians, but little 
is known about the characteristics of mentorship. This knowledge would 
be useful for those developing mentorship programs. OBJECTIVE: To 
complete a systematic review of the qualitative literature to explore 
and summarize the development, perceptions and experiences of the 
mentoring relationship in academic medicine. DATE SOURCES: Medline, 
PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Current Contents databases from the earliest 
available date to December 2008. REVIEW METHODS: We included studies 
that used qualitative research methodology to explore the meaning and 
characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. Two investigators 
independently assessed articles for relevance and study quality, and 
extracted data using standardized forms. No restrictions were placed on 
the language of articles. RESULTS: A total of 8,487 citations were 
identified, 114 full text articles were assessed, and 9 articles were 
selected for review. All studies were conducted in North America, and 
most focused on the initiation and cultivation phases of the mentoring 
relationship. Mentoring was described as a complex relationship based on 
mutual interests, both professional and personal. Mentees should take an 
active role in the formation and development of mentoring relationships. 
Good mentors should be sincere in their dealings with mentees, be able 
to listen actively and understand mentees' needs, and have a 
well-established position within the academic community. Some of the 
mentoring functions aim at the mentees' academic growth and others at 
personal growth. Barriers to mentoring and dysfunctional mentoring can 
be related to personal factors, relational difficulties and 
structural/institutional barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Successful mentoring 
requires commitment and interpersonal skills of the mentor and mentee, 
but also a facilitating environment at academic medicine's institutions.

PMID: 19924490 [PubMed - in process]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Acad Med. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'Acad Med.');> 2009 
Dec;84(12):1765-74.


  "Renters" or "owners"? Residents' perceptions and behaviors regarding
  error reduction in teaching hospitals: a literature review.

Padmore JS 
</pubmed?term=%22Padmore%20JS%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Jaeger J 
</pubmed?term=%22Jaeger%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Riesenberg LA 
</pubmed?term=%22Riesenberg%20LA%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Karpovich KP 
</pubmed?term=%22Karpovich%20KP%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Rosenfeld JC 
</pubmed?term=%22Rosenfeld%20JC%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Patow CA 
</pubmed?term=%22Patow%20CA%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland 21044, USA. [log in to unmask]

PURPOSE: Residents' attitudes, practices, and behaviors vary in response 
to medical error within the context of the culture of their 
institutions. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic 
review of the literature focused on residents' attitudes and behaviors 
regarding medical errors in teaching hospitals, including a qualitative 
review of barriers and proposed countermeasures related to residents' 
engagement in patient safety. METHOD: The electronic literature 
databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for articles 
published between January 1988 and June 2008. The search strategy 
yielded 124 articles. A scoring system was developed to assess the 
quality of the overall literature. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met 
eligibility criteria, with 17 published since 2005. There were 12 
cross-sectional, 5 qualitative, 1 cohort and 1 pre-post intervention 
study. Quality assessment scores ranged from 5.5 to 12.5 (possible range 
1.0-16.0). Three studies obtained a score of < or = 8.0, 5 obtained 
scores of 8.5 to 10.5, and 11 studies had scores of 11.0 to 12.5. 
Personal, environmental, and system barriers, and environmental and 
system countermeasures, were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Although the 
published literature on this topic is limited, those articles that exist 
identify barriers that make residents reluctant to engage in 
institutional error identification and/or reduction. Key factors 
identified included a fear of retribution and the perception of 
residents as transient care providers. Whereas several countermeasures 
have been promulgated, the literature reveals scant evidence of their 
effectiveness. Institutions should recognize and capitalize on the 
unique experiences of residents and their potential to become owners in 
patient safety initiatives.

PMID: 19940587 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING VOL 19; NUMBER 3-4 (2010) pp. 447-460
A systematic review and meta-ethnography of the qualitative literature: experiences of the menarche
Chang, Y. T.; Hayter, M.; Wu, S. C.
KEYWORDS
adolescent health • menarche • nurses • reproductive health • school 
nursing • systematic review


  ABSTRACT

Aim. This article is a report of a systematic review and 
meta-ethnography of women's experience of menarche.

Background. Adolescents may experience menarche at different ages, but 
menarche remains an important milestone in the female maturation 
process, representing the transition from childhood to womanhood.

Design. Systematic review and meta-ethnography.

Methods. Electronic databases were systematically searched and 
supplemented with reference lists searching. Qualitative studies of 
women's experience of menarche were purposely selected and questions 
proposed by the critical appraisal skills programme was adapted and used 
to assess papers prior to synthesis. Key themes and concepts were 
extracted and synthesised using meta-ethnography.

Results. Fourteen studies on menarche experience were identified. The 
majority of studies were descriptive. Five key concepts were identified 
from all 14 papers as being descriptive of women's experience of 
menarche. These included: menarche preparation, significant others' 
response to menarche, physical experience of menarche, psychological 
experience of menarche and social-cultural perspective of menarche.

Conclusions. Menarche experience had a major impact on women. Women went 
through physical, psychological and social-culture changes when their 
first menstrual flow came. Menarche preparation has been shown to have a 
beneficial impact on the menarcheal woman. School nurses have accurate 
knowledge about sexual health; they can and should provide appropriate 
menstrual education.

Relevance to clinical practice. The findings can be used by school 
nurses working with adolescents as the basis for a framework of 
intervention strategies directed towards helping adolescents to better 
accept their menarche and transition into womanhood.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Int J Nurs Stud. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'Int J Nurs Stud.');>. 
[Epub ahead of print]


  The user experience of critical care discharge: A meta-synthesis of
  qualitative research.

Bench S 
</pubmed?term=%22Bench%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Day T 
</pubmed?term=%22Day%20T%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College, 
James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, United 
Kingdom.

OBJECTIVES: This review identifies the most significant factors, which 
impact upon the user experience of progress and recovery from critical 
illness during the first month after discharge from critical care, and 
discusses these in relation to the development of effective critical 
care discharge support strategies. DESIGN: Meta-synthesis of qualitative 
primary research. DATA SOURCES: Qualitative research published in 
English between 1990 and 2009 was identified using online databases: 
CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, British Nursing Index, CDSR, ACP Journal Club, 
Cochrane library, Social Policy and Practice and PsycInfo. Studies of 
adult patients, relatives/carers/significant others, which focused on 
experiences after discharge from an intensive care or high dependency 
unit to a general ward were retrieved. REVIEW METHODS: Following 
screening against inclusion/exclusion criteria, methodological appraisal 
of studies was conducted using a published framework. Ten studies met 
the criteria for inclusion. RESULTS: Five key themes emerged from the 
meta-synthesis: physical and psychological symptoms; making progress; 
the need to know; and safety and security. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from 
this meta-synthesis and other related literature supports the existence 
of physical and psychological problems in the immediate period following 
discharge from critical care to the ward, and suggests that patients and 
their families have a desire for more control over their recovery. 
However, this desire is countered by a need to feel safe and protected, 
culminating in an expression of dependence on healthcare staff. Any 
effective support strategy needs to take account of these findings.

PMID: 20004396 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BMC Health Serv Res. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'BMC Health Serv 
Res.');> 2009 Dec 10;9:226.


  Researching the mental health needs of hard-to-reach groups: managing
  multiple sources of evidence.

Dowrick C 
</pubmed?term=%22Dowrick%20C%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Gask L 
</pubmed?term=%22Gask%20L%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Edwards S 
</pubmed?term=%22Edwards%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Aseem S 
</pubmed?term=%22Aseem%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Bower P 
</pubmed?term=%22Bower%20P%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Burroughs H 
</pubmed?term=%22Burroughs%20H%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Catlin A 
</pubmed?term=%22Catlin%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Chew-Graham C 
</pubmed?term=%22Chew-Graham%20C%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Clarke P 
</pubmed?term=%22Clarke%20P%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Gabbay M 
</pubmed?term=%22Gabbay%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Gowers S 
</pubmed?term=%22Gowers%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>,Hibbert 
D 
</pubmed?term=%22Hibbert%20D%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Kovandzic M 
</pubmed?term=%22Kovandzic%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Lamb J 
</pubmed?term=%22Lamb%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Lovell K 
</pubmed?term=%22Lovell%20K%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Rogers A 
</pubmed?term=%22Rogers%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Lloyd-Williams M 
</pubmed?term=%22Lloyd-Williams%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Waheed W 
</pubmed?term=%22Waheed%20W%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>; 
AMP Group 
</pubmed?term=%22AMP%20Group%22%5BCorporate%20Author%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

Primary Care Research Group, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, 
Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. [log in to unmask]

BACKGROUND: Common mental health problems impose substantial challenges 
to patients, carers, and health care systems. A range of interventions 
have demonstrable efficacy in improving the lives of people experiencing 
such problems. However many people are disadvantaged, either because 
they are unable to access primary care, or because access does not lead 
to adequate help. New methods are needed to understand the problems of 
access and generate solutions. In this paper we describe our 
methodological approach to managing multiple and diverse sources of 
evidence, within a research programme to increase equity of access to 
high quality mental health services in primary care. METHODS: We began 
with a scoping review to identify the range and extent of relevant 
published material, and establish key concepts related to access. We 
then devised a strategy to collect - in parallel - evidence from six 
separate sources: a systematic review of published quantitative data on 
access-related studies; a meta-synthesis of published qualitative data 
on patient perspectives; dialogues with local stakeholders; a review of 
grey literature from statutory and voluntary service providers; 
secondary analysis of patient transcripts from previous qualitative 
studies; and primary data from interviews with service users and 
carers.We synthesised the findings from these diverse sources, made 
judgements on key emerging issues in relation to needs and services, and 
proposed a range of potential interventions. These proposals were 
debated and refined using iterative electronic and focus group 
consultation procedures involving international experts, local 
stakeholders and service users. CONCLUSIONS: Our methods break new 
ground by generating and synthesising multiple sources of evidence, 
connecting scientific understanding with the perspectives of users, in 
order to develop innovative ways to meet the mental health needs of 
under-served groups.

PMID: 20003275 [PubMed - in process]

PMCID: PMC2799397

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harm Reduct J. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'Harm Reduct J.');> 2009 
Nov 20;6:32.


  Integrated programs for women with substance use issues and their
  children: a qualitative meta-synthesis of processes and outcomes.

Sword W 
</pubmed?term=%22Sword%20W%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Jack S 
</pubmed?term=%22Jack%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Niccols A 
</pubmed?term=%22Niccols%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Milligan K 
</pubmed?term=%22Milligan%20K%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Henderson J 
</pubmed?term=%22Henderson%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Thabane L 
</pubmed?term=%22Thabane%20L%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 
[log in to unmask]

BACKGROUND: There is a need for services that effectively and 
comprehensively address the complex needs of women with substance use 
issues and their children. A growing body of literature supports the 
relevance of integrated treatment programs that offer a wide range of 
services in centralized settings. Quantitative studies suggest that 
these programs are associated with positive outcomes. A qualitative 
meta-synthesis was conducted to provide insight into the processes that 
contribute to recovery in integrated programs and women's perceptions of 
benefits for themselves and their children. METHODS: A comprehensive 
search of published and unpublished literature to August 2009 was 
carried out for narrative reports of women's experiences and perceptions 
of integrated treatment programs. Eligibility for inclusion in the 
meta-synthesis was determined using defined criteria. Quality assessment 
was then conducted. Qualitative data and interpretations were extracted 
from studies of adequate quality, and were synthesized using a 
systematic and iterative process to create themes and overarching 
concepts. RESULTS: A total of 15 documents were included in the 
meta-synthesis. Women experienced a number of psychosocial processes 
during treatment that played a role in their recovery and contributed to 
favourable outcomes. These included: development of a sense of self; 
development of personal agency; giving and receiving of social support; 
engagement with program staff; self-disclosure of challenges, feelings, 
and past experiences; recognizing patterns of destructive behaviour; and 
goal setting. A final process, the motivating presence of children, 
sustained women in their recovery journeys. Perceived outcomes included 
benefits for maternal and child well-being, and enhanced parenting 
capacity. CONCLUSION: A number of distinct but interconnected processes 
emerged as being important to women's addiction recovery. Women 
experienced individual growth and transformative learning that led to a 
higher quality of life and improved interactions with their children. 
The findings support the need for programs to adopt practices that focus 
on improving maternal health and social functioning in an environment 
characterized by empowerment, safety, and connections. Women's 
relationships with their children require particular attention as 
positive parenting practices and family relationships can alter 
predispositions toward substance use later in life, thereby impacting 
favourably on the cycle of addiction and dysfunctional parenting.

PMID: 19930575 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC2789048

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Int J Nurs Stud. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'Int J Nurs Stud.');> 
2010 Jan;47(1):89-107. Epub 2009 Oct 24.


  Older people's and relatives' experiences in acute care settings:
  systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.

Bridges J 
</pubmed?term=%22Bridges%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Flatley M 
</pubmed?term=%22Flatley%20M%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Meyer J 
</pubmed?term=%22Meyer%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

City University London, School of Community and Health Sciences, Philpot 
Street, Whitechapel London E1 2EA, UK. [log in to unmask]

OBJECTIVE: To explore older people's and their relatives' views on and 
experiences of acute health care. DESIGN: Systematic procedures were 
used for study selection and data extraction and analysis. A comparative 
thematic approach to synthesis was taken with a number of features 
adopted from the literature on meta-ethnography. DATA SOURCES: Worldwide 
grey and published literature written in English between January 1999 
and June 2008 identified from databases: CINAHL, Medline, British 
Nursing Index, EMBASE Psychiatry, International Bibliography of the 
Social Sciences, PsychINFO, and AgeInfo. REVIEW METHODS: We conducted a 
systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies describing older 
patients' and/or their relatives' experiences of care in acute hospital 
settings. 42 primary studies and 1 systematic review met the inclusion 
criteria. RESULTS: A number of themes emerged. The quality of technical 
care is often taken for granted by older patients, and good or bad 
experiences are described more in terms of relational aspects of care. 
Older patients in hospital may feel worthless, fearful or not in control 
of what happens, especially if they have impaired cognition, or 
communication difficulties. Three key features of care consistently 
mediated these negative feelings and were linked to more positive 
experiences: "creating communities: connect with me", "maintaining 
identity: see who I am" and "sharing decision-making: include me". 
CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the perspectives of older people 
and their relatives on the delivery of personalized and dignified care 
in acute settings. They lend support to previous calls for 
relationship-centred approaches to care and provide a useful 
experience-based framework for practice for those involved in care for 
older people.

PMID: 19854441 [PubMed - in process]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BMJ. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'BMJ.');> 2010 Jan 19;340:c112. 
doi: 10.1136/bmj.c112.


  The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for
  chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of
  qualitative studies.

Morton RL 
</pubmed?term=%22Morton%20RL%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Tong A 
</pubmed?term=%22Tong%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Howard K 
</pubmed?term=%22Howard%20K%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Snelling P 
</pubmed?term=%22Snelling%20P%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Webster AC 
</pubmed?term=%22Webster%20AC%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, 
Australia. [log in to unmask]

OBJECTIVE: To synthesise the views of patients and carers in decision 
making regarding treatment for chronic kidney disease, and to determine 
which factors influence those decisions. DESIGN: Systematic review of 
qualitative studies of decision making and choice for dialysis, 
transplantation, or palliative care, and thematic synthesis of 
qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, 
social work abstracts, and digital theses (database inception to week 3 
October 2008) to identify literature using qualitative methods (focus 
groups, interviews, or case studies). Review methods Thematic synthesis 
involved line by line coding of the findings of the primary studies and 
development of descriptive and analytical themes. RESULTS: 18 studies 
that reported the experiences of 375 patients and 87 carers were 
included. 14 studies focused on preferences for dialysis modality, three 
on transplantation, and one on palliative management. Four major themes 
were identified as being central to treatment choices: confronting 
mortality (choosing life or death, being a burden, living in limbo), 
lack of choice (medical decision, lack of information, constraints on 
resources), gaining knowledge of options (peer influence, timing of 
information), and weighing alternatives (maintaining lifestyle, family 
influences, maintaining the status quo). CONCLUSIONS: The experiences of 
other patients greatly influenced the decision making of patients and 
carers. The problematic timing of information about treatment options 
and synchronous creation of vascular access seemed to predetermine 
haemodialysis and inhibit choice of other treatments, including 
palliative care. A preference to maintain the status quo may explain why 
patients often remain on their initial therapy.

PMID: 20085970 [PubMed - in process] 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


Transplantation. <javascript:AL_get(this, 'jour', 'Transplantation.');> 
2010 Jan 19. [Epub ahead of print]


  Community Preferences for the Allocation of Solid Organs for
  Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Tong A 
</pubmed?term=%22Tong%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Howard K 
</pubmed?term=%22Howard%20K%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Jan S 
</pubmed?term=%22Jan%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Cass A 
</pubmed?term=%22Cass%20A%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Rose J 
</pubmed?term=%22Rose%20J%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Chadban S 
</pubmed?term=%22Chadban%20S%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Allen RD 
</pubmed?term=%22Allen%20RD%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>, 
Craig JC 
</pubmed?term=%22Craig%20JC%22%5BAuthor%5D&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstract>.

1Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, 
Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, 
The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 3Renal Division, The 
George Institute for International Health, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 
Australia. 4The Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, The University of 
Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 5Faculty of Economics and Business, 
Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney, 
Sydney, NSW, Australia. 6Central Clinical School, Bosch Institute, The 
University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 7Department of Renal 
Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

BACKGROUND.: Organs for transplantation are a scarce community resource 
but community preferences and how they are incorporated into allocation 
policies are unclear. This systematic review aimed to ascertain 
community preferences for organ allocation and the principles 
underpinning these preferences. METHODS.: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, 
EconLit, and gray literature databases were searched. Quantitative data 
were extracted, and a qualitative textual synthesis of the results and 
conclusions reported in each included study was performed. RESULTS.: 
Fifteen studies involving more than 5563 respondents were included. 
Seven themes describing community preferences for organ allocation were 
identified: (1) maximum benefit, to achieve maximum health gain in 
recipient survival and quality of life; (2) social valuation, to base 
preferences on societal gain; (3) moral deservingness, to consider the 
"worthiness" of recipients based on their social standing and lifestyle 
decisions; (4) prejudice, to make a judgement based on personal 
ideologic viewpoints; (5) "fair innings," to provide an organ 
preferentially to the younger recipient giving opportunity for a 
"normal" life span and to those waiting for a first organ rather than a 
retransplant; (6) "first come, first served," to allocate the organ to 
recipients wait-listed the longest; and (7) medical urgency, to allocate 
based on illness severity and saving life. CONCLUSIONS.: Community 
preferences for organ allocation hinge on a complex balance of 
efficiency, social valuation, morality, fairness, and equity principles. 
Being a community-held resource, effective ways to identify and 
incorporate community preferences into allocation algorithms for solid 
organ transplantation are warranted.

PMID: 20090570 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW VOL 30; NUMBER 1 (2010) pp. 113-126
The impact of dementia on self and identity: A systematic review
Caddell, L. S.; Clare, L.


      Abstract

There is much debate in the literature as to the extent to which self 
and identity persist in people with dementia. The aim of this systematic 
review was to examine methods currently used to investigate self and 
identity in people with dementia, and the resulting evidence as to the 
persistence of self and identity throughout the course of the disease. 
Thirty-three studies were reviewed, which showed that many approaches 
have been taken to studying aspects of self and identity in dementia, 
including both quantitative and qualitative methods. This appears to be 
partly due to the differing underlying concepts of self that have been 
used as a basis for these studies. Consequently, results obtained from 
these studies are somewhat disparate, although it is possible to draw 
some tentative conclusions from the available evidence. Almost all of 
the studies suggest that there is at least some evidence for persistence 
of self in both the mild and moderate to severe stages of the illness, 
although many studies record some degree of deterioration in aspects of 
self or identity. Further research is required to clarify existing 
evidence and to address outstanding questions regarding self and 
identity in dementia.

*Keywords: *Alzheimer's disease; Vascular dementia; Fronto-temporal 
dementia; Personhood; Self-concept; Selfhood

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS VOL 29; NUMB 4 (2009) pp. 235-241
UK health-care professionals experience of on-line learning techniques: A systematic review of qualitative data
Carroll, C.; Booth, A.; Papaioannou, D.; Sutton, A.; Wong, R.
INTRODUCTION: Continuing professional development and education is vital to the provision of better health services and outcomes. The aim of this study is to contribute to the evidence base by performing a systematic review of qualitative data from studies reporting health professionals' experience of e-learning. No such previous review has been published. METHOD: A systematic review of qualitative data reporting UK health professionals' experiences of the ways in which on-line learning is delivered by higher education and other relevant institutions. Evidence synthesis was performed with the use of thematic analysis grounded in the data. RESULTS: Literature searches identified 19 relevant studies. The subjects of the studies were nurses, midwives, and allied professions (8 studies), general practitioners and hospital doctors (6 studies), and a range of different health practitioners (5 studies). The majority of courses were stand-alone continuing professional development modules. Five key themes emerged from the data: peer communication, flexibility, support, knowledge validation, and course presentation and design. DISCUSSION: The effectiveness of on-line learning is mediated by the learning experience. If they are to enhance health professionals' experience of e-learning, courses need to address presentation and course design; they must be flexible, offer mechanisms for both support and rapid assessment, and develop effective and efficient means of communication, especially among the students themselves.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EVIDENCE AND POLICY VOL 5; NUMB 4 (2009) pp. 399-428
Secondary school teachers' and pupils' definitions of bullying in the UK: a systematic review
O Brien, N.

**Abstract: 
**The aim of the systematic review (SR) reported in this article was to compare how UK secondary school pupils and teachers define bullying, using the analytical framework proposed by Naylor et al (2006). Findings were drawn from five major studies - two quantitative, two qualitative and one using mixed methods - and suggest that teachers are much more likely than pupils to employ broader definitions and to include indirect forms of bullying. Possible additions to Naylor et al's framework are highlighted. The SR encompassed views from 3,283 pupils and 225 teachers, and a number of modest implications for policy and practice are identified.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY VOL 38; NUMBER 1 (2010) pp. 99-114
Conceptualization and measurement of the neighborhood in rural settings: a systematic review of the literature
De Marco, A.; De Marco, M. 

**Abstract:**

*I*nterest in the effects of neighborhood context on individual 
wellbeing has increased in recent years. We now know that neighborhood 
conditions, such as poverty and deprivation, negatively impact 
residents. However, most of the extant work has taken an urban focus. 
Less is known about these processes in rural settings. Neighborhood 
conceptualizations, such as Census tracts and block groups, are standard 
in the urban neighborhood effects literature. Yet, rural neighborhoods 
differ from those in urban regions making it unclear how these 
conceptualizations would fit. This systematic review seeks to summarize 
how researchers have conceptualized and measured rural neighborhoods. 
Keyword searches were performed in a variety of databases to compile all 
relevant peer-reviewed articles. After examination, 19 articles fit the 
review criteria. Conceptualizations fell into five categories: 
administrative units, distance from home, town segments, local-actor 
mapped regions, and nongeographical self-definitions. Discussion of the 
merits of each for rural community research is provided.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING VOL 25; NUMBER 1 (2010) pp. 1-14
A systematic review of the evidence on integration of targeted health interventions into health systems
Atun, R.; de Jongh, T.; Secci, F.; Ohiri, K.; Adeyi, O.

*A* l*on*gst*a*nding deb*a*te *on* *health* *systems* org*a*niz*a*ti*on* 
rel*a*tes^ to benefits *of*integr*a*ting *health* progr*a*mmes th*a*t 
emph*a*size^ specific *interventions* *into*m*a*instre*a*m *health* 
*systems* to incre*a*se^ *a*ccess *a*nd improve *health* outcomes. This 
deb*a*te h*a*s l*on*g been^ ch*a*r*a*cterized by pol*a*riz*a*ti*on* *of* 
views *a*nd ideologies, with^ prot*a*g*on*ists for *a*nd *a*g*a*inst 
*integration* *a*rguing *the* rel*a*tive^ merits *of* 
e*a*ch*a*ppro*a*ch. However, *a*ll too frequently *the*se *a*rguments^ 
h*a*ve not been b*a*sed *on*h*a*rd *evidence*. *The* presence *of* both 
integr*a*ted^ *a*nd n*on*-integr*a*ted progr*a*mmes in m*a*ny countries 
suggests *the*re^ m*a*y be benefits to ei*the*r*a*ppro*a*ch, but *the* 
rel*a*tive merits^ *of* *integration* in v*a*rious c*on*texts *a*nd for 
different *interventions*^ h*a*ve not been *systematic**a*lly 
*a*n*a*lysed *a*nd documented. In this p*a*per we present findings *of* 
*a* *systematic* *review* th*a*t^ explores *a* bro*a*d r*a*nge *of* 
*evidence* *on*: (i) *the* extent*a*nd n*a*ture^ *of* *the* 
*integration* *of* *targeted* *health* progr*a*mmes th*a*t emph*a*size^ 
specific *interventions* *into* critic*a*l* health* *systems* 
functi*on*s,^ (ii) how *the* *integration* or n*on*-*integration* *of* 
*health* progr*a*mmes^ *into* critic*a*l *health**systems* functi*on*s 
in different c*on*texts^ h*a*s influenced progr*a*mme success, (iii) how 
c*on*textu*a*l f*a*ctors^ h*a*ve *a*ffected *the*extent to which *the*se 
progr*a*mmes were integr*a*ted^ *into* critic*a*l *health* *systems* 
functi*on*s.Our *a*n*a*lysis shows few inst*a*nces where *the*re is full 
*integration*^ *of* *a* *health* interventi*on* or where *a*n 
interventi*on* is completely^ n*on*-integr*a*ted. Inste*a*d, *the*re 
exists *a* highly heterogeneous^ picture both for *the* n*a*ture *a*nd 
*a*lso for *the*extent *of* *integration*.^ *Health* *systems* combine 
both n*on*-integr*a*ted *a*nd integr*a*ted *interventions*,^ but *the* 
b*a*l*a*nce *of**the*se *interventions* v*a*ries c*on*sider*a*bly.

*Key Words:* *Health* *systems*, *targeted* progr*a*mmes, *integration*, 
vertic*a*l progr*a*mmes, horiz*on*t*a*l progr*a*mmes 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 


WORK -ANDOVER MEDICAL PUBLISHERS INCORPORATED THEN IOS PRESS- VOL 34; NUMB 1 (2010) pp. 33-44
Disruption, disbelief and resistance: A meta-synthesis of disability in the workplace
Gewurtz, R.; Kirsh, B.


          Abstract

This article presents the findings from a meta-synthesis of qualitative 
research on the experiences of persons with disabilities in the 
workplace. The purpose of this review was to explore how organizational 
culture influences the experiences of people with disabilities in the 
workplace, and the impact of disability on organizational culture. 
Findings from seven qualitative peer-reviewed studies on the experiences 
of people with disabilities at work and organizational culture published 
between 1995 and 2006 were synthesized using the meta-ethnography 
approach. The findings highlight how experiences of people with 
disabilities and organizational culture intersect in the workplace. 
Specifically, accessibility in the workplace involves more than removing 
physical barriers. People with disabilities are affected by the degree 
of acceptance and flexibility in the workplace, and relationships with 
co-workers and supervisors. However, the presence of disability may be 
perceived as disruptive to the organization, operation and structure of 
the workplace, resulting in disbelief and resistance. The findings 
suggest that attention and resources should be directed supporting the 
implementation of disability and human rights legislation and increasing 
tolerance for diversity in the workplace.


          Keywords

Organizational culture, disability in the workplace, qualitative 
research, meta-synthesis
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION VOL 29; NUMB 4 (2009) pp. 445-460
Meta-synthesis on learners' experience of aggression in secondary schools in South Africa
Myburgh, C.; Poggenpoel, M.
This meta-synthesis is on research conducted by different researchers in a team research project on learners’ experience of aggression in secondary schools in South Africa. The objective was to obtain a broader understanding of their experience of aggression in different contexts in South Africa, as well as possible ways to assist learners to address the experienced aggression. Eleven completed research projects were purposively sampled. Data were collected utilising the following headings: objectives, sampling, research design, research method,
and research results, and guidelines. At the end of the meta- synthesis process the results are described, with supporting direct quotations from participants and a literature control. Guidelines for learners to cope with aggression are described.
http://www.sajournalofeducation.co.za/index.php/saje/article/viewFile/290/174
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Andrew Booth BA Dip Lib MSc MCLIP<br>
Reader in Evidence Based Information Practice &amp;<br>
Director of Information<br>
School of Health &amp; Related Research (ScHARR)<br>
University of Sheffield, Regent Court,<br>
30 Regent Street, SHEFFIELD<br>
S1 4DA<br>
Tel: +44(0)114 244 3622<br>
Fax: +44(0)114 272 4095<br>
Email: [log in to unmask]<br>
<br>
<span class="Apple-style-span"
 style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;"><span
 class="Apple-style-span"
 style="font-family: arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; text-align: left;">First
you're an unknown, then you write one book and you move up to obscurity.<br>
&nbsp; -<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><b><span
 style="color: rgb(28, 70, 128);">Martin Myers</span></b></span></span><br>
</body>
</html>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
March 2022
February 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
December 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager