JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  December 2009

PHD-DESIGN December 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

ph.d.'s signification of expertise

From:

jeremy hunsinger <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

jeremy hunsinger <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:12:29 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (84 lines)

I don't think there will be a 'new degree'  there is in some countries a degree above the ph.d.  The existence of that degree in Australia granted sort of honorarily, and in the Nordic countries after completing other work after the dissertations.   There is also the M.Phil. which is the degree some universities offer if you do not produce a dissertation but complete all the work necessary for that.

the ph.d. signifies its minimum standard.   It currently means you have produced unique research that your committee thinks meets the level of a doctorate.   It does not mean you've produced a manuscript of a certain length, as for the last 30 years many universities around the world have allowed dissertations by compilation of published materials.  It does not mean that you are capable of managing a research project of any size because many doctoral dissertations are managed by the supervisors as part of a research group.  It does not mean you have defended the research in any way, as several universities do not require oral or written defenses.   It does not necessarily mean anything else other than the production of research approved by a committee. People have indicated that the doctoral dissertation means a person has performed a mental transformation.... and it doesn't mean that either.  Anything else is likely reflected in one's vita.  

As I said, there is no necessary magic here, there is nothing special to a dissertation, it is a person performing work to a level that can pass review.  The work can be anything the the committee accepts.  This is not to say that some people do not have miraculous transformations,  but I've never seen a good one, though i've seen many people have breakdowns or other problems because, i'd argue, they were buying into the ideology or magical transformation mindset, that tells them everything will be different.  At my Uni, we have  had jr professors commit suicide before because of this ideology of transformation, etc.  Post-dissertation depression is actually quite well known as a problem.  I think academics need to really critically reflect on it and see what harm it is doing by posing the dissertation as something transformative, it is academic labour in pursuit of a goal, which is attainable by many people.  There is no special transformation that occurs, anymore than the transformation of any other knowledge gained, a car mechanic has the exact same thing.  

That should reduce the doctoral experience sufficiently to what it really has become, a qualification.  Nothing special to it other than it qualifies you to perform some jobs in some people's eyes.

My statement below was to indicate that for many universities in the U.S. there is a graduate faculty.  Admission to the graduate faculty is usually granted after a period of years in which one serves on graduate student committees and performs related tasks, etc.  This I'd argue is the apprenticeship in supervision that seems to be required and missing from doctoral programs.   Many universities have recognized that performing as a doctoral student is insufficient to supervise doctoral students.  Some people might be able to, but some will not, so they have this other institution to try to ensure that students are supervised well.  (note it also aids in making sure doctoral students are not supervised by people without tenure, thus limiting the obvious problems there for both supervisor and student)





On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Filippo A. Salustri wrote:

> I know there are many places in the world where there are effectively 2
> kinds (or more) of PhDs.  I'm uncomfortable with this because this does not
> allow for the distinction of kinds of expertise.  I'm not saying that one
> "kind" is better or worse than the other.  I am saying is that if "PhD"
> becomes nothing more than a container object for a bunch of relatively
> diverse things, then it itself will tend to lose meaning.  Because I believe
> strongly in intellectual and educational diversity, I would prefer to see a
> variety of post-masters (or however we want to call them) degrees, where PhD
> would be the one used to signify a particular speciality.
> 
> Nor does this preclude the title of "doctor" being used for other degrees.
> D.Eng, for instance.  Doctor of Engineering; doctor of philosophy; and
> doctor of I don't know what all else.  They all share the title of "doctor",
> which generalizes the level of expertise, then some other specifier that
> narrows down the field a little.
> 
> Cheers.
> Fil
> 
> 2009/12/6 jeremy hunsinger <[log in to unmask]>
> 
>>> 
>>> If research and supervision skills are irrelevant to a PhD, then we'll
>>> need a second degree. Otherwise, we'll be awarding two kinds of PhD: one
>>> for people who can do research and supervise research training, another
>>> for people who simply want to call themselves doctor. Unless we're
>>> moving in that direction, demonstrating these skills establishes the
>>> basis for awarding or denying the PhD.
>> 
>> many universities already have this system, but don't need a degree for it.
>> in the u.s. that is, many universities maintain a graduate faculty who are
>> almost all tenured with significant research records and only those faculty
>> can be chairs or supervisors.  this has been going on for quite some time
>> from what I can tell.  you don't need another degree for it, you just have
>> to have the institutional design for it.    entrance into graduate faculty
>> is usually by peer review, though some places it is automatically granted
>> with tenure or with full professorship.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Jeremy Hunsinger
>> Center for Digital Discourse and Culture
>> Virginia Tech
>> Information Ethics Fellow, Center for Information Policy Research, School
>> of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>> http://wiki.tmttlt.com
>> http://www.tmttlt.com
>> 
>> Whoever ceases to be a student has never been a student.
>> -George Iles
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Filippo A. Salustri, Ph.D., P.Eng.
> Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
> Ryerson University
> 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON
> M5B 2K3, Canada
> Tel: 416/979-5000 ext 7749
> Fax: 416/979-5265
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> http://deseng.ryerson.ca/~fil/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager