Hi
Depends on what you mean by 'efficient' - unless you make sure that the data is pre-processed properly prior to merging such an approach can be very problematic, so yes, I think running melodic with multiple data sets is the better option.
hth
Christian
On 22 Dec 2009, at 21:33, Haisam Islam wrote:
> Thank you, I didn't know that it was already implemented. Does that mean
> that running melodic with multiple datasets as inputs is more efficient than
> concatenating the datasets and running it on that?
|