I have also just heard of a small organisation fitting a "changing place"
toilet, and being told by building control that this does not meet
regulations because there is no hand basin within reach of the pan. They
have been told they will have to fit another cubicle which meets the
regulations.
----- Original Message -----
From: "npt Access" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: Accessible toilet with 500mm dimension reduced to 380mm
> With reduced distance between wall and wc there is a problem that the
> Handbasin prevents a"headon" approach by male wheelchair users who wish to
> use the wc as a Urinal.
> In the past, I have also received a complaint from a double amputee when
> unable to line up straight on due to the fitting of a wide handbasin. This
> prevenrted him having "head on" access which allows him to shunt forward
> off his wheelchair to use the toilet facing the cistern.
>
> Picture from CAE Loo guide.
>
> Cliff Croft
> Access Neath Port Talbot
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Vin wrote:
>> I would echo the points that Jane made - as a Carer every square inch of
>> foot-space is essential in an accessible loo but the 1.5m x 2.2m standard
>> loo is primarily for independent wheelchair users and the issue of
>> misplaced sanitary disposal bins has already been raised.
>> When specifying accessible loos I always stipulate a second drop-down
>> grab rail on the narrow side of the loo because the fixed horizontal rail
>> is too far for most people to reach in a side transfer. Also it must be
>> remembered that the size of 1.5 x 2.2 is the absolute minimum and should
>> be measured _after_ all the box work etc. has been factored in. I'm
>> afraid I see this as poor planning in not burying necessary pipework in
>> the walls and therefore an unacceptable compromise on a minimum
>> specification.
>> Vin
>> Vin West
>> Secretary, Arfon Access Group
>> Glyn Dwr
>> Llandwrog Uchaf
>> Caernarfon
>> LL54 7RA
>> Tel: 01286 880761
>> Mob: 0777 153 6760
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* McConaghy, Martin <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> *Sent:* Monday, November 30, 2009 3:17 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: Accessible toilet with 500mm dimension reduced to
>> 380mm
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>> Disappointing though it is, I see no functional issue with it.
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On
>> Behalf Of *Michael Zuliani
>> *Sent:* 30 November 2009 15:01
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> *Subject:* Accessible toilet with 500mm dimension reduced to 380mm
>>
>>
>> <<Doc2.doc>> All,
>> Photo of toilet situation as discussed previously.
>> Michael Zuliani
>> T
>>
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>
>
> ----------End of Message----------
> Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
> distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme
> visit:
> http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
> Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
>
>
----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
|