JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives


RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives


RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Home

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Home

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK  November 2009

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK November 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: retention of audit trails

From:

Suzy Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Suzy Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:02:30 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (158 lines)

Surely one can still have a retention rule that applies to audit trails?  Is a retention rule not a description of how long a record will be held? 

Regards

Suzy

Suzy Taylor
Records Manager
New College Durham
Framwellgate Moor
Durham 
DH1 5ES

Tel: 0191 375 4422
E-mail: [log in to unmask]

"SAVE THE PLANET - PLEASE DO NOT PRINT THIS EMAIL UNLESS STRICTLY NECESSARY"

>>> Marc Fresko <[log in to unmask]> 27/11/2009 21:48 >>>
David,

No.  Well, not unless you are being humorous.

In case you are being serious:  of course an audit trail is some sort of a
record.  But that does not mean that you can treat it with all the
disciplines of "records management" such as its own retention rules.  For if
you do apply those disciplines, an audit trail ends up with an audit trail
of its own - which in turn...

Have a nice weekend.

Marc

-----Original Message-----
From: The UK Records Management mailing list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David T. Macknet
Sent: 27 November 2009 19:30
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: retention of audit trails

Is an audit trail a record in and of itself?  If so, it has a retention
period.  If not, it gets deleted.  Decide and you have the answer.

-David

-----Original Message-----
From: The UK Records Management mailing list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
[log in to unmask] 
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 7:11 PM
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: retention of audit trails


I agree with Marc but how about making a copy of the audit trail of all
records deleted in a particular year and keeping such an audit trail for 12
years?. The question to be answered is aftr how long a time period will
people expect to be able to check a record was deleted?

Keith Batchelor
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Marc Fresko [log in to unmask] 
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:25:43 -0000
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: retention of audit trails


Please forgive the tardy response but:

In the context of implementing an EDRM system, I'm not sure how you would
implement retention periods that are different for records and for their
audit trails.  In fact, if your system allows you to delete audit trail
data, you'd have to consider what integrity it has.  I'm not saying it
cannot be done, but I am saying that if you do it you would have to be very
cautious.

By way of illustration, the PRO 2002 specification requirements A.6.5 &
A.6.8 specifically prevent deletion of audit trail information if the
records are still held, and I can see no exception.  But the MoReq2
specification requirement 4.2.7 does allow deletion, provided there is some
control such as a certificate that the relevant audit trail had been
scrutinised prior to deletion.

Marc Fresko

-----Original Message-----
From: The UK Records Management mailing list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Caroline Ives
Sent: 20 November 2009 12:29
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: retention of audit trails

We are currently in the process of implementing a corporate EDRMS and as
part of the set up we have been looking at defining audit trail events,
(essentially capturing any action on the document) and determining how long
these should be retained for.

My initial thought was that this should be kept for the lifetime of the
content
itself, (therefore in line with the retention period for the content).

With each piece of content being subject to many actions, (therefore a new
event audited for each action) and potential retention periods of
permanent/upto 100 years for some content, -I've become very conscious of
how we can try to minimise the amount of audit trail information as it will
become extremely burdensome in terms of storage.

I've since revised this to be for the lifetime of final records only, (as
opposed
to audit trails for document and other content which can be deleted on a
frequent and regular basis - e.g. 2 years).

I just wondered what the general consensus was with regards to practical
retention of audit trail data;is there a way of balancing the need to
minimise
storage of audit trail information with the need to be compliant e.g.  with
requirements and standards such as the Legal Admissibility Code of Practice
etc.

Many thanks

Caroline

I'd be grateful to know how other colleagues with corporate wide
implementations of EDRM's have enabled their auditing, (has it been done on
a
blanket wide basis or are there different audit reqs for different
content/depts,
etc.

For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] 
For any content based queries, please email
[log in to unmask] 

For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] 
For any content based queries, please email
[log in to unmask] 


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web LIVE - Free email based on MicrosoftR Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE 

For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] 
For any content based queries, please email
[log in to unmask] 

For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] 
For any content based queries, please email
[log in to unmask] 

For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] 
For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]

For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask]
For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager