Everyone knows what records they are supposed to kee
What about:
Everyone knows what records they are supposed to keep, where and how, and actually does it, so that the organisation can rely on having and being able to find and use the records it needs for business and other purposes.
Susan Healy
Information Policy Consultant and Data Protection Officer
The National Archives
Tel 020 8392 5330 ext 2305
Email [log in to unmask]
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
-----Original Message-----
From: The UK Records Management mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Donald Henderson
Sent: 05 November 2009 09:19
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: What does good records management look like?
Keeping it as non-technical as possible, good RM satisfies the "temp test". In other words, if you describe the filing system to a temp, can they find a given piece of information in a reasonable time. If they can, your systems are good.
Donald Henderson
Information Compliance Manager
Perth & Kinross Council
-----Original Message-----
From: The UK Records Management mailing list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lawrence Serewicz
Sent: 04 November 2009 15:39
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: What does good records management look like?
Dear All,
I have been away from the list for some time, (Jan 2008) but I thought I would jump back in as my role has changed.
This may be a Friday question, but what does good or successful records management look like? I know we can describe bad records management, from the total absence of RM structures and process to simply not being able to locate and extract records.
What, though, is the opposite? How do we know when we have good records management? Is this a metaphysical state where the overall culture of an organisation is able to deal with requests for information well and able to support the performance management framework? I know there are arguments for "business cases" but to my mind that simply reduces RM to an economic question.
I realize that compliance with ISO 15489 can be considered "good records managment" but is it simply compliance or something more? When we talk about good RM or successful RM, what is it?
Perhaps the deeper question is what is the relationship between RM and the day to day work of most staff? In one sense, RM as a cultural phenomenon, rather than a "business case", is one where all staff recognise their role and responsibility towards information they create, handle, and store as well as the records that may be created as a result.
Good RM would then be part of a good corporate culture whereby people are operating with a wider awareness of their RM/DPA/FOI/EIR roles and
responsibilities as fits their post. RM is seen as something they do
as part of
their own work rather than somethign that is done to them or by someone else on their behalf. However, if this is the case (very much open to debate and
discussion) then RM needs to fit more into the corporate culture perhaps through the performance management framework rather than for what many may perceive as a specialism hidden away within or around FOI/DPA (access to information) or archives. I am not suggesting Performance Indicators for RM as such, which creates its own problems, but understanding how it fits within the wider corporate culture and the day to day lives of most staff.
The above is a gross simplification designed to develop debate. My concern is that the more RM is seen as a technical specialism done by someone rather than seen as part of everyone's existence [not that everyone is an RM but rather they have to be aware of RM] then the hard it will to make the "business case" or the cultural case.
My apologies if this has been discussed in the archives. I scanned them but could not find this type of discussion.
I would be grateful for your views on this topic.
Best,
Lawrence
For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]
Securing the future... - Improving services - Enhancing quality of life - Making best use of public resources.
The information in this email is solely for the intended recipients.
If you are not an intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, or distribute its contents or use them in any way: please advise the sender immediately and delete this email.
Perth & Kinross Council does not warrant that this email or any attachments are virus-free and does not accept any liability for any loss or damage resulting from any virus infection. Perth & Kinross Council may monitor or examine any emails received by its email system.
The information contained in this email may not be the views of Perth & Kinross Council. It is possible for email to be falsified and the sender cannot be held responsible for the integrity of the information contained in it.
Requests to Perth & Kinross Council under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act should be directed to the Freedom of Information Team - email: [log in to unmask]
General enquiries should be made to [log in to unmask] or
01738
475000.
Securing the future... - Improving services - Enhancing quality of life - Making best use of public resources.
For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask] For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]
This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation?s IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Archives Disclaimer
This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to The National Archives. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message
or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message
and attachments that do not relate to the official business of The National Archives are neither given nor endorsed by it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For any technical queries re JISC please email [log in to unmask]
For any content based queries, please email [log in to unmask]
|