This is exactly what I want. Do you know some command which can I use to
keep count of the 2.3 clusters and split them into separate images?
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 08:37:22 +0000, Dave Flitney <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Does something like this do what you want?
>
>First split your 2.3 clusters into separate images.
>Multiply each 2.3 cluster image by the combined 3.1 clusters image and
>discard 2.3 cluster image if result empty, i.e., no common voxels.
>Re-combine all surviving 2.3 cluster images.
>
>Dave Flitney, IT Manager
>University of Oxford, FMRIB Centre
>JR Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU
>T: 01865 222713 F: 01865 222717
>
>On 7 Nov 2009, at 03:48, Gabor Perlaki <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:
>
>> I think the problem is not solvable with a simple multiplication of
>> masks. I
>> would like to keep the clusters from the thresholding 2.3 which
>> contains at
>> least one voxel which is active in thresholding 3.1 as well. But I
>> would
>> like only these clusters from thresholding 2.3. I don't need
>> clusters which
>> are active in thresholding 2.3, but don't contain any voxels which are
>> active in thresholding 3.1. So I want to do a new map from clusters of
>> thresholding 2.3, which have seed with z>3.1.
>>
|