Thank you all for your suggestions. If you have any others, please feel
free to share them. Sarah Thomson and I will go through all of the
suggestions, and will choose some for review (if we can still find them
in press).
Best,
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Anglo-American Health Policy Network [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Marmor, Ted
Sent: 29 November 2009 23:33
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Question regarding Health Economics, Policy and Law
Adam,
A useful effort to learn from what seemed salient and sensible some time
ago. But you leave unclear what you mean by classic. (Nick Mays and
Nick Black)have done something similar with a poll of worthies, as you
have).
I think two conceptions provide a useful screen: what a discipline
regarded once as 'required' and what, from one's perspective now, seems
still a source of crucial understanding. So, for instance, Harry
Eckstein's NHS study was required reading in my graduate experience and,
in my view, is more substantial than his Pressure Group. Equally, Odin
Anderson's comparative work on the US, UK and Sweden was central to
comparativists in the 1960s. And so was Friedson's work on
professionalism.
In short, it would fascinate me to see what others regarded
as central to understandings by their field four decades ago versus
those that survive.
Ted
Ps--the books noted above are my memories of central to the 1960s and
still are useful. I would note that the book by Herman and Anne
Somers--Doctors, Politics and Health insurance--was even more widely
used at least in the US.
----- Original Message -----
From: Anglo-American Health Policy Network <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sun Nov 29 06:01:51 2009
Subject: Re: Question regarding Health Economics, Policy and Law
here! here! George.
Interesting that most of the suggestions are American and come from
Americans. Presumably this reflects their shambolic health care
systems!! whose characteristics are emulated in Europe in terms of
inefficiency and to varying degrees inequity (e.g UK and US health
inequalities), but at least are cheaper!
Alan
George France wrote:
> Archie Cochrane's Effectiveness and Effectiveness of 1972 is a gem
> well worth considering.
> George France
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Adam Oliver <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> *To:* [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 28, 2009 7:24 PM
> *Subject:* Question regarding Health Economics, Policy and Law
>
> Hi
>
> I have a quick question. We're keen to start a new section in
> /Health Economics, Policy and Law/ that revisits and reviews some
> of the classic texts in health policy (economics, political
> science or law-related) from the past. Books we have in mind so
> far are Bob Evans' 'Strained Mercy', one of Brian Abel-Smith's
> books, Victor Fuchs' 'Who Shall Live?', and "The Gift
> Relationship" by Titmuss.
>
> We were wondering if any of you could suggest some classic texts
> that you think we might usefully review in this series?
>
> Best,
>
> Adam
>
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
> communications disclaimer:
> http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/secretariat/legal/disclaimer.htm
>
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/secretariat/legal/disclaimer.htm
|