In general, I'd recommend using SL5 and not SLC5 - at Glasgow, we used
SLC4 for storage purely because of the xfs support, but this is now in
mainline SL5, so we've migrated appropriately.
Sam
2009/10/28 Ivan Degtyarenko <[log in to unmask]>:
> Does it make any difference running on SLC5 or on SL5?
> On SLC5 page they say "Please use SLC5 for tests, and SLC4 for production use."
> http://linux.web.cern.ch/linux/scientific5/
>
> or it is not the case here?
>
> Ivan
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: LHC Computer Grid - Rollout [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> On Behalf Of Farcas Felix
>> Sent: 28. lokakuuta 2009 11:29
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] recommended Linux / gLite version?
>>
>> Hello Ivan
>>
>> I would recommand SL 5.3 if you want with glite 3.2 easy to install SE
>> on it.
>>
>> Felix
>>
>> > We are about to install a new storage element, a small one, one drive
>> > node, no tapes. The goal is to have it in long production run for
>> small
>> > non-LHC VO. A few quick questions:
>> >
>> > - which Linux, SLC4?
>> > Looks like SLC5 is not for production
>> > http://linux.web.cern.ch/linux/scientific5/
>> > - gLite 3.1 or 3.2?
>> > - I assume that the best option for one drive SE is DPM SE?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > Ivan
>> >
>> > Ivan Degtyarenko, D.Sc.(Tech), System Specialist, Grid Technologies
>> > CSC - IT Center for Science LTD., http://www.csc.fi
>> > P.O.BOX 405 FIN-02101 ESPOO, Finland
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ing. drd. Farcas Felix
>> National Institute of Research and Development
>> of Isotopic and Molecular Technology,
>> IT - Department - Cluj-Napoca, Romania
>> yahoo id: felixfarcas
>> skype id: felix.farcas
>> gmail id: felix.farcas
>> mobile: +40-742-195323
>
|