Indeed in my title I deliberately refer back to Henry Flynt's 1961 coinage "concept art",
while at the same time conceptually extracting the text backwards from a 2008 text on
"conceptual poetry" by Marjorie Perloff. Please excuse my ordering error in line six--that
should be " . . . Duchamp Marcel . . . ". "Shifting content into different containers"
demands close attention, and I was preoccupied by which word would end each line and
whether I should punctuate.
Barry
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:18:58 -0600, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>Yup. That backward gaze?
>
>(as already implied...?)
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 Stephen Vincent wrote:
Just as I think I thought.
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 Halvard Johnson wrote:
Just as I thought I think.
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 Barry Alpert wrote:
CONCEPT POETRY
Communication the question poetry not is what information giving
not is information of language the in composed is it although
own our in goes anything that mean not did
prickly quite were poets that learned
properly more but Barthes from not comes construction reader
conceptual the surely Marcel Duchamp invokes
thought up opens that making-meaning of . . .
Barry Alpert / Silver Spring MD US / 10-7-09 (6:51 PM)
|