JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-LINK Archives


LIS-LINK Archives

LIS-LINK Archives


LIS-LINK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-LINK Home

LIS-LINK Home

LIS-LINK  September 2009

LIS-LINK September 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: How to vote by proxy if you don't know anyone at the CILIP AGM

From:

Bruce Royan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bruce Royan <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:04:03 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (89 lines)

Thanks for this Phil

As you say, you aren't a member, but your points about my posting are still
worth responding to. 

I am not in any way blaming the folk who have been taking part in the debate
for the fact that that debate is a bit one-sided: I am partially to blame
for hanging back so long, worried that an intervention from me might be
dismissed as "well he would say that, wouldn't he?". I suspect I'm not the
only one. In my opinion, the more that people know about the financial
position of CILIP, the likelier they are to support an increase. Without
access to that information, it would be natural to prefer not to pay more.
My email was an attempt to help people access that information.

Secondly, I did NOT criticise folk who can't be present for "the debate on
the day": less than 100 out of nearly 20,000 people can get the time
off/afford the travel to be physically present, and I specifically said of
the increased use of proxies, "this is a good thing (democracy in action!)".
I think this, plus the introduction of live blogging of the AGM and the
twitter hashtag #cilipagm is the beginning of a paradigm change. By next
year, I would hope that we will have found a way that allows remote
participation in (and voting during) the AGM without disenfranchising the
thousands of members who don't have web access during working hours. We're
not there yet, but it's a start.   

Finally, I am saddened to be told my attempt to show there is another side
of the argument is "bordering on the offensive". People can only weigh the
arguments, if they are given them. 

Bruce   


********************************************************
Professor Bruce Royan,                   Trustee,
CILIP 
   (Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals)
41 Greenhill Gardens, Edinburgh, EH10 4BL, UK (44) 131 447 3151
********************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Bradley [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 30 September 2009 19:32
To: Bruce Royan; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: How to vote by proxy if you don't know anyone at the CILIP AGM

I shan't be voting one way or another for the simple reason that I'm
not eligible to, but I've been following the discussions with
interest. There are a couple of points in your post that I'd like to
address however.

The debate is already underway, and has been for sometime, and as you
point out, it's being discussed on the net, via Twitter, blogs and so
on. If this debate is one sided it's not really the fault of the
people taking part; those who are in favour of an increase have
exactly the same access to the same facilities and can comment on
blogs, argue at Twitter, or write their own. If (generic) you don't
agree with what's being said, then take part. It's really that
straightforward.

Secondly, why *should* people wait for 'the debate on the day'?
Indeed, why limit this debate to the people who can physically turn
up? We've already seen that people can, and do take part virtually (as
we've seen with the #cilip2 example), and I suppose that it could be
argued that if facilities are not present this merely disenfranchises
those who wish to take part but are not (for reasons of geography,
finance or disability) able to turn up. Web 2.0 resources and social
media are not just a theoretical or academic exercise - they are the
way that people work and engage with each other now. Not to use all
the available avenues for discussion seems nonsensical. To me this is
simply another example (of the many) that the use of social media is
only detrimental to the organisations and individuals who don't engage
with it.

Finally, the fact that you feel it necessary to ask people to weigh
the arguments for and against is deeply depressing. I have always
found CILIP members to be thoughtful, intelligent people and my
assumption would be that they ARE weighing the pros and cons - to
think otherwise is bordering on the offensive.

-- 
Phil Bradley: Internet Consultant, Trainer, Web designer and Author.
     Visit http://www.philb.com for free information on Internet
introductions,
   search engine articles, web design tips and a host of other free
information.
        Weblogs: http://www.philbradley.typepad.com/
                       http://philbradley.typepad.com/i_want_to/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager