Yes, I agree. But Kent johnson IS endlessly confusing. I've actually
lost track of where I was in this confusion though.
Tim A.
On 27 Sep 2009, at 13:30, richard owens wrote:
> TIM:
>
> yeah, i'm responding to DB's statement: KJ as "bourgeois writer" vs.
> KJ's Day as bourgeois art object or project.
>
> but as i say, i do see Kent's indefatigable critiques of
> contemporary cultural production as an extension of the same
> concerns that informed his earlier work in education & poetry.
>
|