It was something to do with them needing (or wanting) to target the
resources explicitly from Dirac. Something stopped Dirac telling the WMS
to match only SL5. Any LHCb experts on the list?
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephen Jones
> Sent: 15 September 2009 09:10
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Subclusters
>
> Chris, Stephen,
>
> We have used cpu scaling factors up to now, to allow
> our 1cpu32bit and 8cpu64bit nodes to co-exist. This will end when we
> go to SL5, as the 1cpu32bit nodes must remain on glite 3.1. We aren't
> too intimidated by the missing
> yaim, but we are curious about why LHCb request that SL4/32bit and
> SL5/64bit resources
> are not made available to them off the same CE. That is exactly what
we
> ARE thinking of doing (!)
>
> It would be nice to have your RALPP files as examples - could you
> attach
> them?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stephen Jones
>
> Brew, Chris (STFC,RAL,PPD) wrote:
> > As the original spark for this I guess I should chip in.
> >
>
> --
> Steve Jones [log in to unmask]
> System Administrator office: 220
> High Energy Physics Division tel (int): 42334
> Oliver Lodge Laboratory tel (ext): +44 (0)151 794 2334
> University of Liverpool http://www.liv.ac.uk/physics/hep/
--
Scanned by iCritical.
|