Hi John
Others will probably reply but my understanding was that the HammerCloud
jobs are just part of the testing infrastructure. The actual testing is
of the sites and their bottlenecks not the pilot job framework.
Therefore I think it is good if as many sites as possible remain
involved - it is more about finding capacity/throughput limits than
testing if a site is satisfactory and the subtle changes in the job mix
may bring out new issues each time.
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gordon, JC (John)
Sent: 04 August 2009 09:32
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: HammerCloud - today at 10am onwards.
Might it be an idea for sites which were satisfactory last time to
ignore it and then look back and see what happened? You're not going to
be on full alert at all hours during data taking and it shouldn't need
the whole UK to debug ATLAS pilot job framework.
Just a thought,
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sam Skipsey
> Sent: 04 August 2009 09:15
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: HammerCloud - today at 10am onwards.
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just to remind you that we have another HammerCloud at 10am.
>
> Business as usual. (Indeed, we can assume that these will be fairly
> regular for the next couple of weeks, I guess.)
>
> Sam
--
Scanned by iCritical.
--
Scanned by iCritical.
|