JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Archives


BRITISH-IRISH-POETS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS Home

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS  August 2009

BRITISH-IRISH-POETS August 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: "Has British Poetry had any significance since Wordsworth?"

From:

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

British & Irish poets <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:06:23 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (216 lines)

OK, for a non-specialist like me who has never 
had any problem accepting the first three 
chapters as presented here (hey, I studied this 
stuff with Wasserman at Johns Hopkins, which in 
the sixties may have been the most empiricist 
place on earth) the only thing needing 
clarification is the last two chapters. It's what 
you've said about these that's inflamed sentiment 
on the list. So, how do you see Wordsworth's 
empiricism working its influence in the 20th 
century (one example, please--I know it won't 
cover the whole but it can lead to further 
clarification)? And perhaps a list of poets that 
you take as typical in chapter four on the one 
hand and chapter five on the other might help 
ground the discussion. In fact, if you gave us 
your chapter four list one could ask "you include 
x. How and where do you see Wordsworth's empiricism in x's work?"

Otherwise we're left dealing with "empiricist 
bad, transcendentalist good," which is not so 
much a subject for reason as for belief.

Mark

At 01:47 PM 8/27/2009, you wrote:
>Wordsworth’s Empiricist Poetic and its Influence in the Twentieth
>Century
>
>
>This thesis has two connected aims. Firstly, it claims that it is
>meaningful to describe Wordsworth’s aesthetic, and his beliefs about
>the subject-object relationship, as substantially empiricist. However, it
>is not claimed that Wordsworth is consistently empiricist in the way
>that a philosopher might aspire to be: indeed, there is a place to be
>found within this argument for the recognition of his transcendentalism.
>While it is granted that the word “empiricist” is not always used in the
>most rigorous philosophical sense, the influence of philosophical
>empiricism on Wordsworth naturally figures in the argument. Secondly,
>the thesis demonstrates that the continued influence of Wordsworth in
>the twentieth century has to be understood primarily as the influence of
>his empiricist aesthetic. The thesis concludes by suggesting that there
>are wider possibilities for poetry than are encouraged by this aesthetic.
>The importance of undertaking this project does not lie only in
>objections to Wordsworth’s theory or practice, but arises also from a
>consideration of his continuing influence.
>
>Chapter One argues that on the basis of his poetry and criticism of the
>period 1787 to 1805, the description “The Empirical Wordsworth” is a
>meaningful one. This is established through an examination of
>Wordsworth’s writings, his sister’s journal entries, his correspondence,
>his poetry and contemporaneous literary reviews of The Prelude.
>
>Chapter Two, in order to demonstrate the antecedents of Wordsworth’s
>empiricist beliefs, is a study of his philosophical development from the
>influences of Hartley, Burke and Berkeley.
>
>Chapter Three examines the influence of Coleridge on Wordsworth. This
>is predominantly an empiricist one contrary to received notions of it
>being transcendentalist.
>
>Chapter Four reviews the reading of Wordsworth in the twentieth
>century. This has to be understood in terms of the reaction to
>Romanticism in the twentieth century.
>
>Finally, Chapter Five looks at twentieth-century poetry that largely
>avoids the empiricist influence of Wordsworth. It also introduces the
>concept of “Empirical Identifiers”: an analytic tool for literary criticism.
>
>
>
>
>
>How about you post
>
> >your abstract and we get to ask for clarification?
> >
> >At 01:31 PM 8/27/2009, you wrote:
> >>To analyse a single poem would be difficult as the analysis would
>have
> >>to be seen in light of what I say elsewhere in the thesis, some of
>which
> >>is, in turn, dependent on a discussion of Coleridge's philosophical
> >>influences on Wordsworth, which in itself involves a discussion on
>David
> >>Hartley's influence on Coleridge. If it was a simple matter of posting
> >>convincing soundbites here, I would have done so.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:56:30 -0400, Mark Weiss
> >><[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Jeff: It doesn't seem all that convoluted. Throw
> >> >us the analysis of one poem. Or not. As I told Darwin, I've got a
>lot to
> >>do.
> >> >
> >> >Mark
> >> >
> >> >At 12:46 PM 8/27/2009, you wrote:
> >> >>Certainly, Wordsworth's empiricism is tempered by his
> >> >>transcendentalism in the minds of most people, but my thesis
>argues
> >> >>that it was his transcendentalism which, seemingly paradoxically,
> >> >>inspired his empiricism. It is a closely argued issue and many
> >> >>commentators come down on one side or the other--he is an
> >>empiricist,
> >> >>he is a transcendentalist. My thesis takes note of these positions
> >>and
> >> >>accommodates both but in doing so offers a third possibility, that
> >> >>philosophically he was a transcendentalist but that for him to
>convey
> >> >>the insights he gathered from this view of reality he had to
>adopt an
> >> >>empirical writing mode, as he saw this as the only way these
>insights
> >> >>could be communicated.
> >> >>
> >> >>Yes, the dividing line between romanticism and modernism is not
> >>clear-
> >> >>cut. Yes, Pound and Williams are empiricist, as much of what
>they
> >>say
> >> >>and wrote would have pleased Wordwsworth. What us Imagism,
>after
> >> >>all, but a focusing on phenomena? Where the modernists differ
>from
> >> >>Wordsworth is in the use of fragmentation and elision, which
>renders
> >> >>imagist elements less concrete or descriptive.
> >> >>
> >> >>As I have said it is a convoluted topic. That’s  why I can't argue it
> >> >>effectively in the context of a forum such as this.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:53:01 -0700, David Latane
> >> >><[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >I'm put off I think by the notion of "development of high
> >>modernism."
> >> >>And that this development is "significant." Isn't it part of the
> >> >>impossible narrativity of literary history. (See perhaps David
>Perkins,
> >> >>_Is Literary History Possible?_) By empirical measurements (e.g.,
> >> >>representation in anthologies and textbooks) the high
>modernists in
> >> >>America are getting smaller and smaller each year. Pound is
>banned;
> >> >>Zukofsky nonexistent; Eliot a man of two poems; H. D. and Stein
> >> >>factors mostly because of gender.
> >> >> >I don't see why Wordsworth should have a "sell by date"--a
>cliché
> >>that
> >> >>doesn't make sense to me. Good poets will always cycle back into
> >>the
> >> >>  mix; rotten milk, never.
> >> >> >Wordsworth's writings about poetry, especially (perhaps) the
>essay
> >> >>supplementary, are foundational for modern and modernist
>poetry--
> >>he's
> >> >>a shrewd one, keenly aware of language as poetry's medium, "a
>thing
> >> >>subject to endless fluctuations and arbitrary associations." In
>this he
> >> >>might be read alongside Coleridge--including late works like the
>Aids
> >>to
> >> >>Reflection.
> >> >> >I have in fact read Wordsworth critically, and every which a way
> >>else
> >> >>too. It appears to me that Jeffrey has sided with certain
>Modernists
> >> >>without having really gotten Wordsworth (which is separate from
>the
> >> >>question of whether his influence was deleterious or not).
> >> >> >Jeffrey seems now to be saying that British poets have
>followed
> >> >>W's "man speaking to men" notion and write clearly and
>descriptively
> >> >>when they should be doing something else--and that American
>poets
> >> >>cottoned on to this something else. But is this true? No ideas
>but in
> >> >>things, etc. In those things of the here and now, "in the very
>world,
> >> >>which is the world / Of all of us,--the place where in the end / We
> >>find
> >> >>our happiness, or not at all!"
> >> >> >As for  your sensory train wrecks--I can't say Rimbaud has
>much to
> >>do
> >> >>with American modernism. It's true Pound's American History
>Cantos
> >> >>can give one a good whack, but it's a different thing.
>Unfortunately.
> >>And
> >> >>why doesn't Jeffrey like Sordello? And why should he like Keats?
>More
> >> >>happy love, more happy happy love?
> >> >> >David Latané
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
>&#65007; 
>&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007; 
>&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007; 
>&#65007;Send copy of message to 
>&#65007;[log in to unmask]&#65007;&#65007; 
>&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007; 
>&#65007;&#65007;
>&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;&#65007;Back 
>to:

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager