JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MECCSA Archives


MECCSA Archives

MECCSA Archives


MECCSA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MECCSA Home

MECCSA Home

MECCSA  August 2009

MECCSA August 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

CFP: Cultural Studies and Literature Division, CSA (US) conference, Berkeley, Ca., March 2010

From:

Cultural Studies Association <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Cultural Studies Association <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:39:52 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (83 lines)

Cultural Studies Association (U.S.) 
8th Annual Meeting
University of California, Berkeley
March 18-20, 2010 

	
Division on Cultural Studies and Literature

"Cultural Studies and Literariness-Literature, Medium, Cultural Form"

Deadline for Abstracts (300 words): September 1, 2009 (submission guidelines
below).

There are two stereotypical, yet prevalent, versions of articulating the
relationship between literary and cultural studies that mobilize the concept
of interdisciplinarity. The first  position (mainly surrounding early U.S.
and Australian Cultural Studies) argues for the need to open up lines of
inquiry that have traditionally been barred by the boundaries of
disciplinarity (advertising interdisciplinarity as a liberation struggle of
sorts). The second position considers the growing popularity of
interdisciplinary cultural study a problem and laments the loss of
traditional disciplinary skills as a result of a widespread commitment to
the blurring of disciplinary boundaries that obfuscates vital distinctions
between cultural forms and media. Clearly, neither position is critically
very rigorous, nor can or should such overly simplistic approaches to the
relationship between literary and cultural studies inform critical praxis or
academic policy-making.

This panel intends to recast this discussion in a manner that may yield more
productive answers. To be sure, interdisciplinarity should not come at the
cost of a waning commitment to the study of cultural form and medium. There
is, after all, a difference between film, photography, the novel, music
etc., and there is a difference between a novel, a poem and a play-and these
distinctions matter. Especially, in the context of, for example,
contemporary discussions surrounding the need for more meticulous analyses
of "literariness" in a global/local context or the frequently proclaimed
death of literature, pragmatic, cynical or defeatist announcements of
victories of one cultural form or medium over another appear less useful
than a renewed commitment to the study of the relationship between
literature and other cultural forms and media as it presents itself in the
current context. Therefore, instead of focusing on the ways in which
cultural studies may or may not have contributed to a lacking commitment to
the study of cultural forms and media in the contemporary sociohistorical
conjuncture, this panel invites papers that explore the question of "how to
do both cultural and literary studies" from a different angle. More
specifically, this panel intends to take the rampant proliferation of "new"
media in our historical moment as the occasion to arrive at a better
understanding of medium and form by studying their dialectical
interconnection. 

Questions that should stand at the center of such an inquiry include: 
*	What is this medium called literature and how can cultural studies
as a discipline contribute to our understanding of literature and aspects of
literariness? 
*	What is the difference between literature and other media such as
painting, music, photography, film and TV as it presents itself today, and
how can contemporary literary criticism benefit from an engagement with the
disciplinary tools of cultural studies? 
*	How do form and genre factor into our analysis of cultural media and
how can a dialogue between cultural studies and literary studies provide us
with the basis for more rigorous analyses thereof?
*	How do other contemporary media function within the medium
literature? When and to what end do contemporary authors feel compelled to
mobilize other media within literature to represent our sociopolitical
environment? 
*	Is the function of cultural media altered when inserted into another
medium (here, we could think, for example, of the use of various forms of
music in literature) and what do these changing functions tell us about both
our definitions of media and forms as well as our analytical method?

Submit paper abstracts (300 words), A/V equipment requests (if needed) and a
brief CV by September 1, 2009 to:

[log in to unmask]

Mathias Nilges, Ph.D
Assistant Professor
Department of English
PO BOX 5000
St. Francis Xavier University
Antigonish, Nova Scotia
Canada, B2G 2W5

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager