On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:57, Christopher J.
Walker<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Graeme Stewart wrote:
>>
>> Hi All
>>
>> In preparation I reviewed the panda data stager for the UK sites and
>> updated this to use rfcp at those DPM sites where this was not
>> previously set (which was quite a few, actually).
>>
>> I reviewing the large simulation task we swallowed in the last few
>> days (http://tinyurl.com/kqqu9m), Oxford were having most problems
>> with 3600s timeouts on data staging, which I think they should look at
>> (http://tinyurl.com/mzlbl8).
>>
>> QMUL were (and are) offline,
>
> This is something you set, and not us isn't it.
Yes, so if you haven't got a ticket I'll assume it's a mistake on our
side and set you back online.
>
>> but I can't see any tickets. Are they ok?
>
> se02, our old se, doesn't work at the moment, but this is only used for
> atlaslocalgroupdisk (and was used for the ops tests, but I've changed that).
>
>> It may be a hangover from the storm upgrade blues.
>
> It was actually lustre that we upgraded.
OK, thanks for the info.
>
> I'm officially on holiday, so there's a limit to what I'm able and prepared
> to do, but other than se02, are there any outstanding problems that prevent
> us participating?
The ANALY_QMUL queue is online and working ok, AFAICS, so I am going
to set you back online for production as well.
se02 you should probably just retire (for ATLAS anyway). We don't use it.
Now... get back to your holiday and stop reading email!
Cheers
Graeme
--
Dr Graeme Stewart http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/~graeme/
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Scotland
DEATH TO MEETINGS!
|