I've just compiled it with my AcerOne. It seems to work pretty good on
my netbook; Anyway no "real research thing" tried yet. I usually
prefer stand-alone apps, but think it may be very useful (and cheap)
for doing research in open-source style.
Andrea
2009/7/23 Ronggui HUANG <[log in to unmask]>:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:31:08 +0200
> Mike Mellody <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Magnus Larsson<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> > R-QDA is another, interesting, alternative.
>> > http://rqda.r-forge.r-project.org/
>>
>> I've been playing around with this for a little time now because I was
>> attracted by the possibility of user written extensions using R. I've
>> found it very reasonable for what it is, but I don't know that I'd use
>> it for work critical to my career (say) *at the moment*. Perhaps I'm
>> being unfair.
>
> It is not unfair to make such decision, but I am interested in the reasons, and want to know what is the meaning of "critical"? I will think it twice if I have a research grant and can afford popular software in the field. I may use it for my doctral research project. Both types of research are critical to my career, I think. Good to hear your opinions.
>
> Disclaimer: I am author of RQDA.
>
> Ronggui
--
"Two things are infinite, the Universe and Human Stupidity... and I'm
not sure about Universe..."
A.Einstein
|