"Twitter is for tweeting; email is more suitable for longer, threaded
discussions, such as this.
It might help if emailers dispensed with unnecessary footers, such as
postal
addresses, disclaimers, copyright statements and all the other visual
clutter that makes a thread longer than it needs to be and the narrative
more difficult to follow.
Phil Blume"
+1
Completely agree with this. Reduction of the unecessary information which
highlights the spine of the conversation.
Twitter for me, I miss most tweets, I don't have anything like tweetdeck
collecting streams so most things just pass me by. I just keep check
through twitterfox. An idea for the MCG twitter account might be to relay
hot topics within current JISCmail threads.
John Peel (Manchester City Galleries)
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. The full text of the Council's email disclaimer is available at www.manchester.gov.uk/emaildisclaimer
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
Please contact [log in to unmask] with any queries.
**********************************************************************
****************************************************************
For mcg information visit the mcg website at
http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk.
To manage your subscription to this email list visit
http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email.shtml
****************************************************************
|