On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:31:08 +0200
Mike Mellody <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Magnus Larsson<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > R-QDA is another, interesting, alternative.
> > http://rqda.r-forge.r-project.org/
>
> I've been playing around with this for a little time now because I was
> attracted by the possibility of user written extensions using R. I've
> found it very reasonable for what it is, but I don't know that I'd use
> it for work critical to my career (say) *at the moment*. Perhaps I'm
> being unfair.
It is not unfair to make such decision, but I am interested in the reasons, and want to know what is the meaning of "critical"? I will think it twice if I have a research grant and can afford popular software in the field. I may use it for my doctral research project. Both types of research are critical to my career, I think. Good to hear your opinions.
Disclaimer: I am author of RQDA.
Ronggui
> It strikes me though that if the software follows the projected path,
> at some future time R-QDA will be a very serious competitor to the
> expensive alternatives around.
>
>
>
>
> Mike
> Michael Mellody
>
> Ecclesia Knowledge Management
|