JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SOCIAL-POLICY Archives


SOCIAL-POLICY Archives

SOCIAL-POLICY Archives


SOCIAL-POLICY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SOCIAL-POLICY Home

SOCIAL-POLICY Home

SOCIAL-POLICY  June 2009

SOCIAL-POLICY June 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

New OECD Pensions at a Glance 2009 (www.oecd.org/els/social/pensions/PAG) >Crisis highlights the need for sweeping pension reforms, says OECD

From:

Ladaique Max <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:04:35 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (62 lines)

From www.oecd.org today:

23-Jun-2009 >Governments must continue reforms to ensure that public and private retirement income provision is socially as well as financially sustainable, according to the 2009 edition of the OECD's biennial Pensions at a Glance.

With rising unemployment and falling tax revenues squeezing public finances, OECD governments face budget deficits of nearly 9% of national income on average in 2010. This leaves little room for more generous public pensions, according to the 2009 edition of the OECD's biennial Pensions at a Glance. Some countries have already had to cut back on future public spending on pensions.

But private pension schemes have also been badly hit by plunging stock markets, and the way they operate needs to change, says the report. Reforms should include better regulation, more efficient administration, clearer information about risks and rewards of different options and an automatic switch to less risky investments as people near retirement.

"Reforming pension systems now to make them both affordable and strong enough to provide protection against market swings citizens will save governments a lot of financial and political pain in the future," OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría commented.

Because of the long horizon involved in pensions - with 60 years on average between when people make their first contribution and receive their last benefit - all kinds of pension provision are subject to risks and uncertainties of different kinds. Diversifying pension provision remains the right strategy, in the face of demographic, political, economic and financial risks, according to the report. Rolling back reforms and trying to rely on public pay-as-you-go financed pensions alone is the wrong way to go.

In addition to analysing the impact of the crisis on pensions, Pensions at Glance 2009 also includes features on the incomes and poverty of older people, recent pension reforms and on the coverage of private pension schemes. The publication also provides comparative indicators on the national pension systems of the 30 OECD countries (see also www.oecd.org/els/statistics).

Country-specific highlights for selected OECD countries, together with media briefs on the financial and economic crisis and pensions and other highlights of the report are available at www.oecd.org/els/social/pensions/PAG 

 
Country-specific highlights:
 
Australia: Superannuation funds have been heavily hit by the financial crisis, with real losses of 26.7% in 2008... More than one in four Australian seniors live in poverty on international measures...

Austria: Austria has the second highest public spending on pensions in OECD countries... The pension replacement rate (pension entitlements relative to earnings) of 80% is much higher than the OECD average of 59%...

France: The over-65s rely more on public transfers for their income than almost anywhere else... Reforms have substantially cut future pension benefits for today's workers by around 20% for average earners... Coping with high public pension expenditures and population ageing will require working longer and a more diversified retirement-income system...

Germany: The German pension system has so far been less affected by the crisis than many other OECD countries... Replacement rates for low-earners are the lowest within the OECD at 43.0%...

Ireland: Ireland's private pension funds have been heavily hit by the financial crisis, with real losses of 37.5% in 2008... More than 30% of Ireland's pensioners live in poverty (on international measures)...

Italy: Italy had the highest public pension spending of OECD countries... Legislated changes that would have increased the pension age and reduced benefits to reflect increased life expectancy have been postponed...

Japan: Japan is the OECD's 'oldest' country, with just 2.6 people, of working age for every person aged over 65... Public pensions in Japan are projected to provide the second lowest pensions relative to individual earnings of OECD countries. 

Canada Korea  United Kingdom  United States >forthcoming


*****
À partir de www.ocde.org ce jour >La crise met en évidence la nécessité d'une réforme profonde des retraites, indique l'OCDE

23-juin-2009 >Les gouvernements doivent poursuivre les réformes afin d'assurer la viabilité financière et sociale des systèmes de retraite publics et privés, selon une nouvelle étude de l'OCDE.

Avec la montée du chômage et la baisse des recettes fiscales qui mettent les finances publiques à rude épreuve, les économies de l'OCDE afficheront en moyenne un déficit budgétaire proche de 9 % du revenu national en 2010. Cette situation ne laisse guère la possibilité aux gouvernements de mener une politique des retraites plus généreuse, comme l'indique l'édition 2009 de la publication bisannuelle Panorama des Pensions. Certains pays ont déjà dû réduire les futures dépenses publiques en matière de retraites.

Par ailleurs, les dispositifs de retraite privés ont eux aussi été durement touchés par l'effondrement des marchés d'actions et leur fonctionnement doit évoluer, selon ce même rapport. Les réformes devraient permettre une meilleure réglementation, une gestion plus efficace, une information plus transparente sur les risques et le rendement des différentes options, ainsi qu'un basculement automatique vers des investissements moins risqués à mesure que l'âge de la retraite se rapproche.

« En réformant aujourd'hui leurs systèmes de retraite pour les rendre à la fois accessibles et suffisamment solides pour protéger les particuliers contre les fluctuations des marchés, les gouvernements s'épargneront bien des difficultés demain sur les plans financier et politique » a déclaré le Secrétaire général de l'OCDE, Angel Gurría.

Compte tenu de l'horizon lointain inhérent aux retraites - il s'écoule en moyenne 60 ans entre le versement des premières cotisations et l'obtention des derniers bénéfices - tous les types de fonds de retraites sont sujets à des risques et à des incertitudes de plusieurs sortes. Face aux risques démographiques, politiques, économiques et financiers, la diversification des fonds de retraites reste la meilleure stratégie, selon le rapport. En revanche, faire machine arrière dans les réformes ou s'appuyer uniquement sur les régimes de retraites publiques par répartition, serait un pas dans la mauvaise direction.

Outre les répercussions de la crise sur les retraites, l'édition 2009 du Panorama des pensions : Les systèmes de retraite dans les pays de l'OCDE analyse en particulier les revenus et la pauvreté des personnes âgées, les réformes récentes des retraites et la couverture des régimes de retraites privés. Cette publication comprend également des indicateurs comparatifs des systèmes de retraite nationaux des économies des 30 pays de l'OCDE (voir aussi www.oecd.org/els/statistiques).

Des analyses détaillées d'une sélection de pays membres de l'OCDE, ainsi que des notes de synthèse destinées aux médias sur les conséquences de la crise économique et financière sur les retraites et d'autres points importants du rapport, sont disponibles sur www.oecd.org/els/social/pensions/PAG-fr.

Points essentiels - France :

France : Les revenus de transferts représentent une part plus importante dans le revenu disponible des personnes de plus de 65 ans que presque partout ailleurs dans l'OCDE...
Les reformes des retraites ont réduit sensiblement le niveau des pensions que toucheront les travailleurs d'aujourd'hui : d'environ 20% pour ceux qui gagnent le salaire moyen. Mais ceux qui ont de faibles revenus  ont été épargnés grâce à des filets de sécurité renforcés... Pour faire face aux dépenses publiques au titre des retraites élevées et au vieillissement de la population, il faudra travailler plus longtemps et diversifier les sources de revenus des retraités, y compris la part des retraites privées...



Contact: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager