On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Andreas Haupt<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 15:40 +0200, Massimo Sgaravatto - INFN Padova
> wrote:
>> >> Another growing space is the proxy delegation directory, which is not
>> >> yet cleaned automatically (http://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?49497)
>> >
>> > I think I am suffering from both problems :
>> >
>> > du -s -k /opt/glite/var/cream_sandbox/*
>> >
>> > 4 /opt/glite/var/cream_sandbox/alice
>> > 4 /opt/glite/var/cream_sandbox/aliceprd
>> > 1800432 /opt/glite/var/cream_sandbox/alicesgm
>> >
>> > du -s -k /opt/glite/var/cream/*
>> >
>> > 909776 /opt/glite/var/cream/user_proxy
>
> ... and so on. One thing that really disturbs me in some of the gLite
> packages (bdii, gip, cream-ce, lcg-ce, ...) is the ignorance of
> "recommendations" stated in LSB (see e.g.:
> http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/execenvfhs.html and http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE14)
>
> Was there a (good...) reason to put configuration and "variable" files
> directly under the /opt path?
No it should not be . Under the current guidelines variable data
should be within
/var/opt/glite
submit a bug.
p.s I am also working on some newer guidelines as well. Your ROC may
have by now
contacted you but I will also post here once I have written some more down.
Steve
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>
> --
> | Andreas Haupt | E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
> | DESY Zeuthen | WWW: http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/~ahaupt
> | Platanenallee 6 | Phone: +49/33762/7-7359
> | D-15738 Zeuthen | Fax: +49/33762/7-7216
>
--
Steve Traylen
|