----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Towers" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: Rise of Steps
> The Approved Document M is just a guide.
> Nothing to stop the use of 180mm or 145mm providing you can explain why.
>
> Brian T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Accessibuilt list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Nick Metcalfe
> Sent: 26 June 2009 14:09
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Rise of Steps
>
> Dear All,
>
> sorry to bother you on a friday afternoon,
> but i was wondering if anyone could tell me why according to part M and
> other
> documentation the rise of a step should be 150mm or 170mm?
>
> Many Thanks
>
> ----------End of Message----------
> Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
> distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme
> visit:
> http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
> Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
>
> ----------End of Message----------
> Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the
> distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme
> visit:
> http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
> Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
----------End of Message----------
Run by SURFACE for more information on research, consultancy and the distance taught MSc. in Accessibility and Inclusive Design programme visit:
http://www.surface.salford.ac.uk
Archives for the Accessibuilt discussion list are located at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/accessibuilt.html
|