JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for STARLINK Archives


STARLINK Archives

STARLINK Archives


STARLINK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

STARLINK Home

STARLINK Home

STARLINK  May 2009

STARLINK May 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

bad bug in makecube?

From:

Jane Buckle <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Starlink Software User Support <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 11 May 2009 16:01:25 +0100

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (137 lines) , pictureA.ps (137 lines) , pictureB.ps (137 lines)

Dear All,

I am seeing startlingly different behaviour when between makecube and 
wcsmosaic (see the two attached images, which were created from the same 
data using these two routines) when I use them to create cubes from four 
files that have different spectral extents, although they are repeated 
observations of the same source. I have changed the way that I clean up 
the raw datafiles, and so one pair of files has the original spectral 
extent, while the other pair have had about 30% clipped from the ends of 
the spectra. The actual makecube command that I use is
"makecube 
in=/mraosw/data4/harp/mjlsg11/raw_cleaned/a20081111_00036_01_0001 
out=temp autogrid=false detectors=! genvar=tsys outcat=! inweight=true 
pixsize=\[7.2,7.2\] sparse=false trim=true weights=false spread=nearest 
params=\[1.0,1.33\] system=tracking usedetpos=false"

If I use makecube, then mfittrend with the following commands (from 
hislist), I get pictureA:

1: 2009 May 11 15:32:21.519 - MAKECUBE        (SMURF V0.4.1)

   Parameters: ALIGNSYS=FALSE AUTOGRID=FALSE BADMASK='OR'
      CROTA=-55.000000000042 DETECTORS=!
      FBL=[1.5135963227979,0.00037905821943821]
      FBR=[1.508831094304,0.0071842303514043]
      FLBND=[1.508806786544,0.00035475123779951,-424.20370675136]
      FUBND=[1.5193107862253,0.01119288100032,442.75726064658]
      FTL=[1.5192864791151,0.0043632445261451]
      FTR=[1.5145213640061,0.011168574035431] GENVAR='tsys' [log in to unmask]
      INWEIGHT=TRUE LBND=[-118,-99] LBOUND=[-118,-99,-512] NTILE=1
      NPOLBIN=1 OUT=@temp OUTCAT=! PARAMS=[1,1.33] PIXSIZE=[7.2,7.2]
      MSG_FILTER='NORM' REF=! REFLAT='0:19:53' REFLON='5:47:00.0'
      SPARSE=FALSE SPECBOUNDS='-423.7804 442.3339' TILEDIMS=! TRIM=TRUE
      WEIGHTS=FALSE SPREAD='nearest' SYSTEM='tracking' UBND=[120,100]
      UBOUND=[120,100,511] USEDETPOS=FALSE
   Software: /soft/star/bin/smurf/makecube

2: 2009 May 11 15:32:35.914 - MFITTREND       (KAPPA 1.9-11)

   Parameters: AUTO=TRUE AXIS=@3 CLIP=[2,2,2.5,3] FITTYPE='Polynomial'
      IN=@temp MASK=! METHOD='Single' MODIFYIN=FALSE NUMBIN=32 ORDER=1
      OUT=@ngc2071_12co_b RMSCLIP=! SUBTRACT=TRUE TITLE=! VARIANCE=TRUE
   Software: /soft/star/bin/kappa/mfittrend

If I use makecube and mfittrend on the individual files, and then 
wcsmosaic (hislist below) to put the final cubes together, I get pictureB.

1: 2009 May 11 14:44:22.095 - MAKECUBE        (SMURF V0.4.1)

   Parameters: ALIGNSYS=FALSE AUTOGRID=FALSE BADMASK='OR'
      CROTA=-55.000000000042 DETECTORS=!
      FBL=[1.5137192681308,0.00050775633035526]
      FBR=[1.5089740600772,0.0072843421205392]
      FLBND=[1.5089497522708,0.00048344931397717,-424.20370675136]
      FUBND=[1.5190906087172,0.011052734630646,442.75726064658]
      FTL=[1.5190663015624,0.0042516937035154]
      FTR=[1.5143211976496,0.011028427618018] GENVAR='tsys'
      IN=@/mraosw/data4/harp/mjlsg11/raw_cleaned/a20081111_00036_01_000?
      INWEIGHT=TRUE LBND=[-117,-94] LBOUND=[-117,-94,-512] NTILE=1
      NPOLBIN=1 OUT=@temp OUTCAT=! PARAMS=[1,1.33] PIXSIZE=[7.2,7.2]
      MSG_FILTER='NORM' REF=! REFLAT='0:19:53' REFLON='5:47:00.0'
      SPARSE=FALSE SPECBOUNDS='-423.7804 442.3339' TILEDIMS=! TRIM=TRUE
      WEIGHTS=FALSE SPREAD='nearest' SYSTEM='tracking' UBND=[120,93]
      UBOUND=[120,93,511] USEDETPOS=FALSE
   Software: /star/bin/smurf/makecube

2: 2009 May 11 14:44:36.318 - MFITTREND       (KAPPA 1.9-11)

   Parameters: AUTO=TRUE AXIS=@3 CLIP=[2,2,2.5,3] FITTYPE='Polynomial'
      IN=@temp MASK=! METHOD='Single' MODIFYIN=FALSE NUMBIN=32 ORDER=1
      OUT=@mc_20081111_00036_01 RMSCLIP=! SUBTRACT=TRUE TITLE=!
      VARIANCE=TRUE
   Software: /star/bin/kappa/mfittrend

3: 2009 May 11 14:48:29.082 - WCSMOSAIC       (KAPPA 1.9-11)

   Parameters: ACC=0.05
      FLBND=[1.5089097074157,0.00048344931397717,-424.20370675136]
      FUBND=[1.5195481106442,0.011430254274311,442.75726064658]
      GENVAR=FALSE ILEVEL=2 [log in to unmask] LBND=!
      LBOUND=[-117,-99,-512] MAXPIX=1000 METHOD='nearest'
      OUT=@test_ngc2071_12co REF=! UBND=! UBOUND=[122,104,511]
      VARIANCE=TRUE WLIM=1E-10
   Software: /star/bin/kappa/wcsmosaic


Both of these are run on the same 4 files:

/mraosw/data4/harp/mjlsg11/raw_cleaned/a20081111_00036_01_0001
/mraosw/data4/harp/mjlsg11/raw_cleaned/a20081111_00037_01_0001
/mraosw/data4/harp/mjlsg11/raw_cleaned/a20090131_00028_01_0001
/mraosw/data4/harp/mjlsg11/raw_cleaned/a20090131_00029_01_0001

the files from 20081111 have a spectral extent, from ndftrace:
      No. of dimensions:  3
      Dimension size(s):  1024 x 16 x 5488
      Pixel bounds     :  1:1024, 1:16, 1:5488
      Total pixels     :  89915392
........
        Frame title         : "3-d compound coordinate system"
        Domain              : DSBSPECTRUM-SPACEINDEX-TIME
        First pixel centre  : -423.7804, 1, 2008-11-11 12:45:27

while the files from 20090131 have:
      No. of dimensions:  3
      Dimension size(s):  716 x 12 x 5805
      Pixel bounds     :  155:870, 1:12, 1:5805
      Total pixels     :  49876560
........
        Frame title         : "3-d compound coordinate system"
        Domain              : DSBSPECTRUM-SPACEINDEX-TIME
        First pixel centre  : -293.3614, 1, 2009-01-31 08:26:41


Any clues about this? What this looks like visually is the detector 
gains problem, but it clearly is not. Is it possible that part of the 
'gains' issue was that the spectral dimension was not being identically 
written for all files, and makecube needs files that have identical 
spectral extents?

Anyway, I hope for enlightenment, and a method of reducing files of 
varying spectral extents.


Cheers,

Jane

-- 

Dr Jane V. Buckle 	
Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Lab, J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE
Tel: +44 (0)1223 337298



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
November 2023
August 2023
July 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
April 2022
January 2022
December 2021
October 2021
May 2021
February 2021
November 2020
October 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
February 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
April 2018
January 2018
December 2017
October 2017
August 2017
July 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
September 2016
July 2016
June 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
December 2004
September 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager